summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/sched
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-08-12idle: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offlinePeter Zijlstra
Scheduling-clock interrupts can arrive late in the CPU-offline process, after idle entry and the subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead(). Once execution passes the call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring the CPU, which results in lockdep complaints when the interrupt handler uses RCU: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.2.0-rc1+ #681 Not tainted ----------------------------- kernel/sched/fair.c:9542 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: RCU used illegally from offline CPU! rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no locks held by swapper/5/0. stack backtrace: CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1+ #681 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0x5e/0x8b trigger_load_balance+0xa8/0x390 ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60 update_process_times+0x3b/0x50 tick_sched_handle+0x2f/0x40 tick_sched_timer+0x32/0x70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xd3/0x3b0 hrtimer_interrupt+0x11d/0x270 ? sched_clock_local+0xc/0x74 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x200 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> RIP: 0010:delay_tsc+0x22/0x50 Code: ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 65 44 8b 05 18 a7 11 48 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 89 d6 48 c1 e6 20 48 09 c6 eb 0e f3 90 65 8b 05 fe a6 11 48 <41> 39 c0 75 18 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 c1 e2 20 48 09 c2 48 89 d0 48 29 RSP: 0000:ffff8f92c0157ed0 EFLAGS: 00000212 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: ffff8c861f356400 RCX: ffff8f92c0157e64 RDX: 000000321214c8cc RSI: 00000032120daa7f RDI: 0000000000260f15 RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8c861ee18000 R15: ffff8c861ee18000 cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x31/0x60 do_idle+0x1d5/0x200 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40 cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 start_secondary+0x151/0x170 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This happens rarely, but can be forced by happen more often by placing delays in cpuhp_report_idle_dead() following the call to rcu_report_dead(). With this in place, the following rcutorture scenario reproduces the problem within a few minutes: tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 8 --duration 5 --kconfig "CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y" --configs "TREE04" This commit uses the crude but effective expedient of moving the disabling of interrupts within the idle loop to precede the cpu_is_offline() check. It also invokes tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() instead of tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick_protected() to shut off the scheduling-clock interrupt. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> [ paulmck: Revert tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick_protected() removal, new callers. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
2019-08-12sched/fair: Use rq_lock/unlock in online_fair_sched_groupPhil Auld
Enabling WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK in /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features causes warning to fire in update_rq_clock. This seems to be caused by onlining a new fair sched group not using the rq lock wrappers. [] rq->clock_update_flags & RQCF_UPDATED [] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 54385 at kernel/sched/core.c:210 update_rq_clock+0xec/0x150 [] Call Trace: [] online_fair_sched_group+0x53/0x100 [] cpu_cgroup_css_online+0x16/0x20 [] online_css+0x1c/0x60 [] cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x231/0x3b0 [] cgroup_mkdir+0x41b/0x530 [] kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x61/0xa0 [] vfs_mkdir+0x108/0x1a0 [] do_mkdirat+0x77/0xe0 [] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1d0 [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Using the wrappers in online_fair_sched_group instead of the raw locking removes this warning. [ tglx: Use rq_*lock_irq() ] Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801133749.11033-1-pauld@redhat.com
2019-08-10cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits changeViresh Kumar
To avoid reducing the frequency of a CPU prematurely, we skip reducing the frequency if the CPU had been busy recently. This should not be done when the limits of the policy are changed, for example due to thermal throttling. We should always get the frequency within the new limits as soon as possible. Trying to fix this by using only one flag, i.e. need_freq_update, can lead to a race condition where the flag gets cleared without forcing us to change the frequency at least once. And so this patch introduces another flag to avoid that race condition. Fixes: ecd288429126 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Don't set next_freq to UINT_MAX") Cc: v4.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+ Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-08-08cpufreq: schedutil: fix equation in commentQais Yousef
scale_irq_capacity() call in schedutil_cpu_util() does util *= (max - irq) util /= max But the comment says util *= (1 - irq) util /= max Fix the comment to match what the scaling function does. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802104628.8410-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
2019-08-08sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-pathPeter Zijlstra
Avoid the RETRY_TASK case in the pick_next_task() slow path. By doing the put_prev_task() early, we get the rt/deadline pull done, and by testing rq->nr_running we know if we need newidle_balance(). This then gives a stable state to pick a task from. Since the fast-path is fair only; it means the other classes will always have pick_next_task(.prev=NULL, .rf=NULL) and we can simplify. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aa34d24b36547139248f32a30138791ac6c02bd6.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
2019-08-08sched: Allow put_prev_task() to drop rq->lockPeter Zijlstra
Currently the pick_next_task() loop is convoluted and ugly because of how it can drop the rq->lock and needs to restart the picking. For the RT/Deadline classes, it is put_prev_task() where we do balancing, and we could do this before the picking loop. Make this possible. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4519f6850477ab7f3d257062796e6425ee4ba7c.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
2019-08-08sched/fair: Expose newidle_balance()Peter Zijlstra
For pick_next_task_fair() it is the newidle balance that requires dropping the rq->lock; provided we do put_prev_task() early, we can also detect the condition for doing newidle early. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e3eb1859b946f03d7e500453a885725b68957ba.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
2019-08-08sched: Add task_struct pointer to sched_class::set_curr_taskPeter Zijlstra
In preparation of further separating pick_next_task() and set_curr_task() we have to pass the actual task into it, while there, rename the thing to better pair with put_prev_task(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a96d1bcdd716db4a4c5da2fece647a1456c0ed78.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
2019-08-08sched: Rework CPU hotplug task selectionPeter Zijlstra
The CPU hotplug task selection is the only place where we used put_prev_task() on a task that is not current. While looking at that, it occured to me that we can simplify all that by by using a custom pick loop. Since we don't need to put current, we can do away with the fake task too. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>
2019-08-08sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_taskPeter Zijlstra
Because pick_next_task() implies set_curr_task() and some of the details haven't mattered too much, some of what _should_ be in set_curr_task() ended up in pick_next_task, correct this. This prepares the way for a pick_next_task() variant that does not affect the current state; allowing remote picking. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/38c61d5240553e043c27c5e00b9dd0d184dd6081.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
2019-08-08sched: Fix kerneldoc comment for ia64_set_curr_taskPeter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fde3a65ea3091ec6b84dac3c19639f85f452c5d1.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
2019-08-08sched/fair: Fix low cpu usage with high throttling by removing expiration of ↵Dave Chiluk
cpu-local slices It has been observed, that highly-threaded, non-cpu-bound applications running under cpu.cfs_quota_us constraints can hit a high percentage of periods throttled while simultaneously not consuming the allocated amount of quota. This use case is typical of user-interactive non-cpu bound applications, such as those running in kubernetes or mesos when run on multiple cpu cores. This has been root caused to cpu-local run queue being allocated per cpu bandwidth slices, and then not fully using that slice within the period. At which point the slice and quota expires. This expiration of unused slice results in applications not being able to utilize the quota for which they are allocated. The non-expiration of per-cpu slices was recently fixed by 'commit 512ac999d275 ("sched/fair: Fix bandwidth timer clock drift condition")'. Prior to that it appears that this had been broken since at least 'commit 51f2176d74ac ("sched/fair: Fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period")' which was introduced in v3.16-rc1 in 2014. That added the following conditional which resulted in slices never being expired. if (cfs_rq->runtime_expires != cfs_b->runtime_expires) { /* extend local deadline, drift is bounded above by 2 ticks */ cfs_rq->runtime_expires += TICK_NSEC; Because this was broken for nearly 5 years, and has recently been fixed and is now being noticed by many users running kubernetes (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/67577) it is my opinion that the mechanisms around expiring runtime should be removed altogether. This allows quota already allocated to per-cpu run-queues to live longer than the period boundary. This allows threads on runqueues that do not use much CPU to continue to use their remaining slice over a longer period of time than cpu.cfs_period_us. However, this helps prevent the above condition of hitting throttling while also not fully utilizing your cpu quota. This theoretically allows a machine to use slightly more than its allotted quota in some periods. This overflow would be bounded by the remaining quota left on each per-cpu runqueueu. This is typically no more than min_cfs_rq_runtime=1ms per cpu. For CPU bound tasks this will change nothing, as they should theoretically fully utilize all of their quota in each period. For user-interactive tasks as described above this provides a much better user/application experience as their cpu utilization will more closely match the amount they requested when they hit throttling. This means that cpu limits no longer strictly apply per period for non-cpu bound applications, but that they are still accurate over longer timeframes. This greatly improves performance of high-thread-count, non-cpu bound applications with low cfs_quota_us allocation on high-core-count machines. In the case of an artificial testcase (10ms/100ms of quota on 80 CPU machine), this commit resulted in almost 30x performance improvement, while still maintaining correct cpu quota restrictions. That testcase is available at https://github.com/indeedeng/fibtest. Fixes: 512ac999d275 ("sched/fair: Fix bandwidth timer clock drift condition") Signed-off-by: Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linux@indeed.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: John Hammond <jhammond@indeed.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Kyle Anderson <kwa@yelp.com> Cc: Gabriel Munos <gmunoz@netflix.com> Cc: Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Cc: Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1563900266-19734-2-git-send-email-chiluk+linux@indeed.com
2019-08-08sched: Clean up active_mm reference countingPeter Zijlstra
The current active_mm reference counting is confusing and sub-optimal. Rewrite the code to explicitly consider the 4 separate cases: user -> user When switching between two user tasks, all we need to consider is switch_mm(). user -> kernel When switching from a user task to a kernel task (which doesn't have an associated mm) we retain the last mm in our active_mm. Increment a reference count on active_mm. kernel -> kernel When switching between kernel threads, all we need to do is pass along the active_mm reference. kernel -> user When switching between a kernel and user task, we must switch from the last active_mm to the next mm, hoping of course that these are the same. Decrement a reference on the active_mm. The code keeps a different order, because as you'll note, both 'to user' cases require switch_mm(). And where the old code would increment/decrement for the 'kernel -> kernel' case, the new code observes this is a neutral operation and avoids touching the reference count. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: luto@kernel.org
2019-08-06sched/psi: Do not require setsched permission from the trigger creatorSuren Baghdasaryan
When a process creates a new trigger by writing into /proc/pressure/* files, permissions to write such a file should be used to determine whether the process is allowed to do so or not. Current implementation would also require such a process to have setsched capability. Setting of psi trigger thread's scheduling policy is an implementation detail and should not be exposed to the user level. Remove the permission check by using _nocheck version of the function. Suggested-by: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: mingo@redhat.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kernel-team@android.com Cc: dennisszhou@gmail.com Cc: dennis@kernel.org Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190730013310.162367-1-surenb@google.com
2019-08-06sched/psi: Reduce psimon FIFO priorityPeter Zijlstra
PSI defaults to a FIFO-99 thread, reduce this to FIFO-1. FIFO-99 is the very highest priority available to SCHED_FIFO and it not a suitable default; it would indicate the psi work is the most important work on the machine. Since Real-Time tasks will have pre-allocated memory and locked it in place, Real-Time tasks do not care about PSI. All it needs is to be above OTHER. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2019-08-06sched/deadline: Fix double accounting of rq/running bw in push & pullDietmar Eggemann
{push,pull}_dl_task() always calls {de,}activate_task() with .flags=0 which sets p->on_rq=TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING. {push,pull}_dl_task()->{de,}activate_task()->{de,en}queue_task()-> {de,en}queue_task_dl() calls {sub,add}_{running,rq}_bw() since p->on_rq==TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING. So {sub,add}_{running,rq}_bw() in {push,pull}_dl_task() is double-accounting for that task. Fix it by removing rq/running bw accounting in [push/pull]_dl_task(). Fixes: 7dd778841164 ("sched/core: Unify p->on_rq updates") Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802145945.18702-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
2019-08-01time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast_offline() lockdep complaintPaul E. McKenney
The TASKS03 and TREE04 rcutorture scenarios produce the following lockdep complaint: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.2.0-rc1+ #513 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. migration/1/14 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (____ptrval____) (tick_broadcast_lock){?...}, at: tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70 {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1c0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50 tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot+0xd/0x40 tick_switch_to_oneshot+0x4f/0xd0 hrtimer_run_queues+0xf3/0x130 run_local_timers+0x1c/0x50 update_process_times+0x1c/0x50 tick_periodic+0x26/0xc0 tick_handle_periodic+0x1a/0x60 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x80/0x2a0 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4e/0x60 rcu_nocb_gp_kthread+0x15d/0x590 kthread+0xf3/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 irq event stamp: 171 hardirqs last enabled at (171): [<ffffffff8a201a37>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c hardirqs last disabled at (170): [<ffffffff8a201a53>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8a264ee0>] copy_process.part.56+0x650/0x1cb0 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(tick_broadcast_lock); <Interrupt> lock(tick_broadcast_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by migration/1/14: #0: (____ptrval____) (clockevents_lock){+.+.}, at: tick_offline_cpu+0xf/0x30 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 14 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1+ #513 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5e/0x8b print_usage_bug+0x1fc/0x216 ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x1b0/0x1b0 mark_lock+0x1f2/0x280 __lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x18f0 ? __lock_acquire+0x21b/0x18f0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4e/0x60 lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1c0 ? tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70 _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x40 ? tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70 tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70 tick_offline_cpu+0x16/0x30 take_cpu_down+0x7d/0xa0 multi_cpu_stop+0xa2/0xe0 ? cpu_stop_queue_work+0xc0/0xc0 cpu_stopper_thread+0x6d/0x100 smpboot_thread_fn+0x169/0x240 kthread+0xf3/0x130 ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 ? kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To reproduce, run the following rcutorture test: tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --duration 5 --kconfig "CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y" --configs "TASKS03 TREE04" It turns out that tick_broadcast_offline() was an innocent bystander. After all, interrupts are supposed to be disabled throughout take_cpu_down(), and therefore should have been disabled upon entry to tick_offline_cpu() and thus to tick_broadcast_offline(). This suggests that one of the CPU-hotplug notifiers was incorrectly enabling interrupts, and leaving them enabled on return. Some debugging code showed that the culprit was sched_cpu_dying(). It had irqs enabled after return from sched_tick_stop(). Which in turn had irqs enabled after return from cancel_delayed_work_sync(). Which is a wrapper around __cancel_work_timer(). Which can sleep in the case where something else is concurrently trying to cancel the same delayed work, and as Thomas Gleixner pointed out on IRC, sleeping is a decidedly bad idea when you are invoked from take_cpu_down(), regardless of the state you leave interrupts in upon return. Code inspection located no reason why the delayed work absolutely needed to be canceled from sched_tick_stop(): The work is not bound to the outgoing CPU by design, given that the whole point is to collect statistics without disturbing the outgoing CPU. This commit therefore simply drops the cancel_delayed_work_sync() from sched_tick_stop(). Instead, a new ->state field is added to the tick_work structure so that the delayed-work handler function sched_tick_remote() can avoid reposting itself. A cpu_is_offline() check is also added to sched_tick_remote() to avoid mucking with the state of an offlined CPU (though it does appear safe to do so). The sched_tick_start() and sched_tick_stop() functions also update ->state, and sched_tick_start() also schedules the delayed work if ->state indicates that it is not already in flight. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> [ paulmck: Apply Peter Zijlstra and Frederic Weisbecker atomics feedback. ] Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2019-08-01sched/deadline: Ensure inactive_timer runs in hardirq contextJuri Lelli
SCHED_DEADLINE inactive timer needs to run in hardirq context (as dl_task_timer already does) on PREEMPT_RT Change the mode to HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD. [ tglx: Fixed up the start site, so mode debugging works ] Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190731103715.4047-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
2019-08-01sched: Mark hrtimers to expire in hard interrupt contextSebastian Andrzej Siewior
The scheduler related hrtimers need to expire in hard interrupt context even on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels. Mark then as such. No functional change. [ tglx: Split out from larger combo patch. Add changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726185753.077004842@linutronix.de
2019-07-31sched/preempt: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION where appropriateThomas Gleixner
CONFIG_PREEMPTION is selected by CONFIG_PREEMPT and by CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. Both PREEMPT and PREEMPT_RT require the same functionality which today depends on CONFIG_PREEMPT. Switch the preemption code, scheduler and init task over to use CONFIG_PREEMPTION. That's the first step towards RT in that area. The more complex changes are coming separately. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726212124.117528401@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/core: Silence a warning in sched_init()Qian Cai
Compiling a kernel with both FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=n and RT_GROUP_SCHED=n will generate a compiler warning: kernel/sched/core.c: In function 'sched_init': kernel/sched/core.c:5906:32: warning: variable 'ptr' set but not used It is unnecessary to have both "alloc_size" and "ptr", so just combine them. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190720012319.884-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/core: Fix CPU controller for !RT_GROUP_SCHEDJuri Lelli
On !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED configurations it is currently not possible to move RT tasks between cgroups to which CPU controller has been attached; but it is oddly possible to first move tasks around and then make them RT (setschedule to FIFO/RR). E.g.: # mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/group1 # chrt -fp 10 $$ # echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/group1/tasks bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument # chrt -op 0 $$ # echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/group1/tasks # chrt -fp 10 $$ # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/group1/tasks 2345 2598 # chrt -p 2345 pid 2345's current scheduling policy: SCHED_FIFO pid 2345's current scheduling priority: 10 Also, as Michal noted, it is currently not possible to enable CPU controller on unified hierarchy with !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED (if there are any kernel RT threads in root cgroup, they can't be migrated to the newly created CPU controller's root in cgroup_update_dfl_csses()). Existing code comes with a comment saying the "we don't support RT-tasks being in separate groups". Such comment is however stale and belongs to pre-RT_GROUP_SCHED times. Also, it doesn't make much sense for !RT_GROUP_ SCHED configurations, since checks related to RT bandwidth are not performed at all in these cases. Make moving RT tasks between CPU controller groups viable by removing special case check for RT (and DEADLINE) tasks. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719063455.27328-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/core: Prevent race condition between cpuset and __sched_setscheduler()Juri Lelli
No synchronisation mechanism exists between the cpuset subsystem and calls to function __sched_setscheduler(). As such, it is possible that new root domains are created on the cpuset side while a deadline acceptance test is carried out in __sched_setscheduler(), leading to a potential oversell of CPU bandwidth. Grab cpuset_rwsem read lock from core scheduler, so to prevent situations such as the one described above from happening. The only exception is normalize_rt_tasks() which needs to work under tasklist_lock and can't therefore grab cpuset_rwsem. We are fine with this, as this function is only called by sysrq and, if that gets triggered, DEADLINE guarantees are already gone out of the window anyway. Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-9-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/deadline: Fix bandwidth accounting at all levels after offline migrationJuri Lelli
If a task happens to be throttled while the CPU it was running on gets hotplugged off, the bandwidth associated with the task is not correctly migrated with it when the replenishment timer fires (offline_migration). Fix things up, for this_bw, running_bw and total_bw, when replenishment timer fires and task is migrated (dl_task_offline_migration()). Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-5-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25cpusets: Rebuild root domain deadline accounting informationMathieu Poirier
When the topology of root domains is modified by CPUset or CPUhotplug operations information about the current deadline bandwidth held in the root domain is lost. This patch addresses the issue by recalculating the lost deadline bandwidth information by circling through the deadline tasks held in CPUsets and adding their current load to the root domain they are associated with. Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> [ Various additional modifications. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-4-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/core: Streamle calls to task_rq_unlock()Mathieu Poirier
Calls to task_rq_unlock() are done several times in the __sched_setscheduler() function. This is fine when only the rq lock needs to be handled but not so much when other locks come into play. This patch streamlines the release of the rq lock so that only one location need to be modified when dealing with more than one lock. No change of functionality is introduced by this patch. Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/topology: Add partition_sched_domains_locked()Mathieu Poirier
Introduce the partition_sched_domains_locked() function by taking the mutex locking code out of the original function. That way the work done by partition_sched_domains_locked() can be reused without dropping the mutex lock. No change of functionality is introduced by this patch. Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bristot@redhat.com Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Introduce fits_capacity()Viresh Kumar
The same formula to check utilization against capacity (after considering capacity_margin) is already used at 5 different locations. This patch creates a new macro, fits_capacity(), which can be used from all these locations without exposing the details of it and hence simplify code. All the 5 code locations are updated as well to use it.. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b477ac75a2b163048bdaeb37f57b4c3f04f75a31.1559631700.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping CPU in local nodeWanpeng Li
In real product setup, there will be houseeking CPUs in each nodes, it is prefer to do housekeeping from local node, fallback to global online cpumask if failed to find houseeking CPU from local node. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561711901-4755-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/stats: Fix unlikely() use of sched_info_on()Yi Wang
sched_info_on() is called with unlikely hint, however, the test is to be a constant(1) on which compiler will do nothing when make defconfig, so remove the hint. Also, fix a lack of {}. Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: up2wing@gmail.com Cc: wang.liang82@zte.com.cn Cc: xue.zhihong@zte.com.cn Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562301307-43002-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Fall back to sched-idle CPU if idle CPU isn't foundViresh Kumar
We try to find an idle CPU to run the next task, but in case we don't find an idle CPU it is better to pick a CPU which will run the task the soonest, for performance reason. A CPU which isn't idle but has only SCHED_IDLE activity queued on it should be a good target based on this criteria as any normal fair task will most likely preempt the currently running SCHED_IDLE task immediately. In fact, choosing a SCHED_IDLE CPU over a fully idle one shall give better results as it should be able to run the task sooner than an idle CPU (which requires to be woken up from an idle state). This patch updates both fast and slow paths with this optimization. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@linaro.org Cc: songliubraving@fb.com Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com Cc: subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com Cc: tkjos@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/eeafa25fdeb6f6edd5b2da716bc8f0ba7708cbcf.1561523542.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Start tracking SCHED_IDLE tasks count in cfs_rqViresh Kumar
Track how many tasks are present with SCHED_IDLE policy in each cfs_rq. This will be used by later commits. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: chris.redpath@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@linaro.org Cc: songliubraving@fb.com Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com Cc: subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com Cc: tkjos@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0d3cdc427fc68808ad5bccc40e86ed0bf9da8bb4.1561523542.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast_offline() lockdep complaintPaul E. McKenney
time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast_offline() lockdep complaint The TASKS03 and TREE04 rcutorture scenarios produce the following lockdep complaint: WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.2.0-rc1+ #513 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. migration/1/14 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (____ptrval____) (tick_broadcast_lock){?...}, at: tick_broadcast_offline+0xf/0x70 {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1c0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50 tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot+0xd/0x40 tick_switch_to_oneshot+0x4f/0xd0 hrtimer_run_queues+0xf3/0x130 run_local_timers+0x1c/0x50 update_process_times+0x1c/0x50 tick_periodic+0x26/0xc0 tick_handle_periodic+0x1a/0x60 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x80/0x2a0 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4e/0x60 rcu_nocb_gp_kthread+0x15d/0x590 kthread+0xf3/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 irq event stamp: 171 hardirqs last enabled at (171): [<ffffffff8a201a37>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c hardirqs last disabled at (170): [<ffffffff8a201a53>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8a264ee0>] copy_process.part.56+0x650/0x1cb0 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [...] To reproduce, run the following rcutorture test: $ tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --duration 5 --kconfig "CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y" --configs "TASKS03 TREE04" It turns out that tick_broadcast_offline() was an innocent bystander. After all, interrupts are supposed to be disabled throughout take_cpu_down(), and therefore should have been disabled upon entry to tick_offline_cpu() and thus to tick_broadcast_offline(). This suggests that one of the CPU-hotplug notifiers was incorrectly enabling interrupts, and leaving them enabled on return. Some debugging code showed that the culprit was sched_cpu_dying(). It had irqs enabled after return from sched_tick_stop(). Which in turn had irqs enabled after return from cancel_delayed_work_sync(). Which is a wrapper around __cancel_work_timer(). Which can sleep in the case where something else is concurrently trying to cancel the same delayed work, and as Thomas Gleixner pointed out on IRC, sleeping is a decidedly bad idea when you are invoked from take_cpu_down(), regardless of the state you leave interrupts in upon return. Code inspection located no reason why the delayed work absolutely needed to be canceled from sched_tick_stop(): The work is not bound to the outgoing CPU by design, given that the whole point is to collect statistics without disturbing the outgoing CPU. This commit therefore simply drops the cancel_delayed_work_sync() from sched_tick_stop(). Instead, a new ->state field is added to the tick_work structure so that the delayed-work handler function sched_tick_remote() can avoid reposting itself. A cpu_is_offline() check is also added to sched_tick_remote() to avoid mucking with the state of an offlined CPU (though it does appear safe to do so). The sched_tick_start() and sched_tick_stop() functions also update ->state, and sched_tick_start() also schedules the delayed work if ->state indicates that it is not already in flight. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Apply Peter Zijlstra and Frederic Weisbecker atomics feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625165238.GJ26519@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Fix imbalance due to CPU affinityVincent Guittot
The load_balance() has a dedicated mecanism to detect when an imbalance is due to CPU affinity and must be handled at parent level. In this case, the imbalance field of the parent's sched_group is set. The description of sg_imbalanced() gives a typical example of two groups of 4 CPUs each and 4 tasks each with a cpumask covering 1 CPU of the first group and 3 CPUs of the second group. Something like: { 0 1 2 3 } { 4 5 6 7 } * * * * But the load_balance fails to fix this UC on my octo cores system made of 2 clusters of quad cores. Whereas the load_balance is able to detect that the imbalanced is due to CPU affinity, it fails to fix it because the imbalance field is cleared before letting parent level a chance to run. In fact, when the imbalance is detected, the load_balance reruns without the CPU with pinned tasks. But there is no other running tasks in the situation described above and everything looks balanced this time so the imbalance field is immediately cleared. The imbalance field should not be cleared if there is no other task to move when the imbalance is detected. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561996022-28829-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Change task_numa_work() storage to staticValentin Schneider
There are no callers outside of fair.c. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: mgorman@suse.de Cc: riel@surriel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190715102508.32434-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Move task_numa_work() init to init_numa_balancing()Valentin Schneider
We only need to set the callback_head worker function once, do it during sched_fork(). While at it, move the comment regarding double task_work addition to init_numa_balancing(), since the double add sentinel is first set there. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: mgorman@suse.de Cc: riel@surriel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190715102508.32434-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Move init_numa_balancing() below task_numa_work()Valentin Schneider
To reference task_numa_work() from within init_numa_balancing(), we need the former to be declared before the latter. Do just that. This is a pure code movement. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: mgorman@suse.de Cc: riel@surriel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190715102508.32434-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Use RCU accessors consistently for ->numa_groupJann Horn
The old code used RCU annotations and accessors inconsistently for ->numa_group, which can lead to use-after-frees and NULL dereferences. Let all accesses to ->numa_group use proper RCU helpers to prevent such issues. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Fixes: 8c8a743c5087 ("sched/numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups for shared faults") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152047.14424-3-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25sched/fair: Don't free p->numa_faults with concurrent readersJann Horn
When going through execve(), zero out the NUMA fault statistics instead of freeing them. During execve, the task is reachable through procfs and the scheduler. A concurrent /proc/*/sched reader can read data from a freed ->numa_faults allocation (confirmed by KASAN) and write it back to userspace. I believe that it would also be possible for a use-after-free read to occur through a race between a NUMA fault and execve(): task_numa_fault() can lead to task_numa_compare(), which invokes task_weight() on the currently running task of a different CPU. Another way to fix this would be to make ->numa_faults RCU-managed or add extra locking, but it seems easier to wipe the NUMA fault statistics on execve. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Fixes: 82727018b0d3 ("sched/numa: Call task_numa_free() from do_execve()") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152047.14424-1-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-20Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvmLinus Torvalds
Pull more KVM updates from Paolo Bonzini: "Mostly bugfixes, but also: - s390 support for KVM selftests - LAPIC timer offloading to housekeeping CPUs - Extend an s390 optimization for overcommit