| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When we're (re)mounting a btrfs filesystem we set the
BTRFS_FS_STATE_REMOUNTING state in fs_info to serialize against async
reclaim or defrags.
This flag is set in btrfs_remount_prepare() called by btrfs_remount().
As btrfs_remount_prepare() does nothing but setting this flag and
doesn't have a second caller, we can just open-code the flag setting in
btrfs_remount().
Similarly do for so clearing of the flag by moving it out of
btrfs_remount_cleanup() into btrfs_remount() to be symmetrical.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Previously we depended on some weird behavior in our chunk allocator to
force the allocation of new stripes, so by the time we got to doing the
reduce we would usually already have a chunk with the proper target.
However that behavior causes other problems and needs to be removed.
First however we need to remove this check to only restripe if we
already have those available profiles, because if we're allocating our
first chunk it obviously will not be available. Simply use the target
as specified, and if that fails it'll be because we're out of space.
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs/061 has been failing consistently for me recently with a
transaction abort. We run out of space in the system chunk array, which
means we've allocated way too many system chunks than we need.
Chris added this a long time ago for balance as a poor mans restriping.
If you had a single disk and then added another disk and then did a
balance, update_block_group_flags would then figure out which RAID level
you needed.
Fast forward to today and we have restriping behavior, so we can
explicitly tell the fs that we're trying to change the raid level. This
is accomplished through the normal get_alloc_profile path.
Furthermore this code actually causes btrfs/061 to fail, because we do
things like mkfs -m dup -d single with multiple devices. This trips
this check
alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(fs_info, cache->flags);
if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) {
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro. Because we're balancing and scrubbing, but
not actually restriping, we keep forcing chunk allocation of RAID1
chunks. This eventually causes us to run out of system space and the
file system aborts and flips read only.
We don't need this poor mans restriping any more, simply use the normal
get_alloc_profile helper, which will get the correct alloc_flags and
thus make the right decision for chunk allocation. This keeps us from
allocating a billion system chunks and falling over.
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When running with -o enospc_debug you can get the following splat if one
of the dump_space_info's trip
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Tainted: G OE
------------------------------------------------------
dd/563090 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9e7dbf4f1e18 (&ctl->tree_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9e7e2284d428 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0xaa/0x120 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3c/0x3c0 [btrfs]
find_free_extent+0x7ef/0x13b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x340 [btrfs]
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs]
__btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x530 [btrfs]
btrfs_cow_block+0x106/0x210 [btrfs]
commit_cowonly_roots+0x55/0x300 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4ed/0xac0 [btrfs]
sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90
generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0x70
cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160
task_work_run+0x5f/0x90
__prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bd/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #2 (&space_info->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1a6/0x3f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_inode_rsv_release+0x4f/0x170 [btrfs]
btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent+0x155/0x480 [btrfs]
clear_state_bit+0x81/0x1a0 [btrfs]
__clear_extent_bit+0x25c/0x5d0 [btrfs]
clear_extent_bit+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
btrfs_invalidatepage+0x2b7/0x3c0 [btrfs]
truncate_cleanup_page+0x47/0xe0
truncate_inode_pages_range+0x238/0x840
truncate_pagecache+0x44/0x60
btrfs_setattr+0x202/0x5e0 [btrfs]
notify_change+0x33b/0x490
do_truncate+0x76/0xd0
path_openat+0x687/0xa10
do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
do_sys_openat2+0x215/0x2d0
do_sys_open+0x44/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&tree->lock#2){+.+.}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
find_first_extent_bit+0x32/0x150 [btrfs]
write_pinned_extent_entries.isra.0+0xc5/0x100 [btrfs]
__btrfs_write_out_cache+0x172/0x480 [btrfs]
btrfs_write_out_cache+0x7a/0xf0 [btrfs]
btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x286/0x3b0 [btrfs]
commit_cowonly_roots+0x245/0x300 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4ed/0xac0 [btrfs]
close_ctree+0xf9/0x2f5 [btrfs]
generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100
kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0x70
cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160
task_work_run+0x5f/0x90
__prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bd/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&ctl->tree_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:
__lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460
lock_acquire+0xab/0x360
_raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_dump_space_info+0xf4/0x120 [btrfs]
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x176/0x180 [btrfs]
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x145/0x550 [btrfs]
cache_save_setup+0x28d/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1fc/0x4f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc/0xac0 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x162/0x4c0 [btrfs]
btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_buffered_write.isra.0+0x19b/0x740 [btrfs]
btrfs_file_write_iter+0x3cf/0x610 [btrfs]
new_sync_write+0x11e/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x1c9/0x200
ksys_write+0x68/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&ctl->tree_lock --> &space_info->lock --> &cache->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&cache->lock);
lock(&space_info->lock);
lock(&cache->lock);
lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
6 locks held by dd/563090:
#0: ffff9e7e21d18448 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x195/0x200
#1: ffff9e7dd0410ed8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#19){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_file_write_iter+0x86/0x610 [btrfs]
#2: ffff9e7e21d18638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5b0 [btrfs]
#3: ffff9e7e1f05d688 (&cur_trans->cache_write_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x158/0x4f0 [btrfs]
#4: ffff9e7e2284ddb8 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0x69/0x120 [btrfs]
#5: ffff9e7e2284d428 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0xaa/0x120 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 563090 Comm: dd Tainted: G OE 5.8.0-rc5+ #20
Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./890FX Deluxe5, BIOS P1.40 05/03/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x96/0xd0
check_noncircular+0x162/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460
? wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x30/0x40
lock_acquire+0xab/0x360
? btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
_raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
? btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_dump_space_info+0xf4/0x120 [btrfs]
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x176/0x180 [btrfs]
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x145/0x550 [btrfs]
? btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data+0x1d/0x60 [btrfs]
cache_save_setup+0x28d/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1fc/0x4f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc/0xac0 [btrfs]
? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x162/0x4c0 [btrfs]
btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_buffered_write.isra.0+0x19b/0x740 [btrfs]
? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa8/0xd0
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0
btrfs_file_write_iter+0x3cf/0x610 [btrfs]
new_sync_write+0x11e/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x1c9/0x200
ksys_write+0x68/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This is because we're holding the block_group->lock while trying to dump
the free space cache. However we don't need this lock, we just need it
to read the values for the printk, so move the free space cache dumping
outside of the block group lock.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We are currently getting this lockdep splat in btrfs/161:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Tainted: G E
------------------------------------------------------
mount/678048 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9b769f15b6e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9b76abdb08d0 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x6a/0x800 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x8b/0x8f0
btrfs_init_new_device+0x2d2/0x1240 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x1de/0x2d20 [btrfs]
ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460
lock_acquire+0xab/0x360
__mutex_lock+0x8b/0x8f0
clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x330/0x800 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0xb7c/0x18ce [btrfs]
btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa [btrfs]
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
fc_mount+0xe/0x40
vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90
btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs]
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
do_mount+0x7de/0xb30
__x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by mount/678048:
#0: ffff9b75ff5fb0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#63/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380
#1: ffffffffc0c2fbc8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x54/0x800 [btrfs]
#2: ffff9b76abdb08d0 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x6a/0x800 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 678048 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 5.8.0-rc5+ #20
Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./890FX Deluxe5, BIOS P1.40 05/03/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x96/0xd0
check_noncircular+0x162/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460
? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
lock_acquire+0xab/0x360
? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
__mutex_lock+0x8b/0x8f0
? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x60
? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20
? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40
? __module_address+0x28/0xf0
? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
? static_obj+0x4f/0x60
? lockdep_init_map_waits+0x43/0x200
? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs]
btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x330/0x800 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0xb7c/0x18ce [btrfs]
? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0
btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa [btrfs]
? vfs_parse_fs_string+0x84/0xb0
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x60
? kfree+0x2b5/0x310
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
fc_mount+0xe/0x40
vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90
btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs]
? cred_has_capability+0x7c/0x120
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x60
? legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
do_mount+0x7de/0xb30
? memdup_user+0x4e/0x90
__x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This is because btrfs_read_chunk_tree() can come upon DEV_EXTENT's and
then read the device, which takes the device_list_mutex. The
device_list_mutex needs to be taken before the chunk_mutex, so this is a
problem. We only really need the chunk mutex around adding the chunk,
so move the mutex around read_one_chunk.
An argument could be made that we don't even need the chunk_mutex here
as it's during mount, and we are protected by various other locks.
However we already have special rules for ->device_list_mutex, and I'd
rather not have another special case for ->chunk_mutex.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's long existed a lockdep splat because we open our bdev's under
the ->device_list_mutex at mount time, which acquires the bd_mutex.
Usually this goes unnoticed, but if you do loopback devices at all
suddenly the bd_mutex comes with a whole host of other dependencies,
which results in the splat when you mount a btrfs file system.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-0.rc3.1.fc33.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
systemd-journal/509 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff970831f84db0 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff97083144d598 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x59/0x560 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #6 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}:
__sb_start_write+0x13e/0x220
btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x59/0x560 [btrfs]
do_page_mkwrite+0x4f/0x130
do_wp_page+0x3b0/0x4f0
handle_mm_fault+0xf47/0x1850
do_user_addr_fault+0x1fc/0x4b0
exc_page_fault+0x88/0x300
asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
-> #5 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__might_fault+0x60/0x80
_copy_from_user+0x20/0xb0
get_sg_io_hdr+0x9a/0xb0
scsi_cmd_ioctl+0x1ea/0x2f0
cdrom_ioctl+0x3c/0x12b4
sr_block_ioctl+0xa4/0xd0
block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #4 (&cd->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820
sr_block_open+0xa2/0x180
__blkdev_get+0xdd/0x550
blkdev_get+0x38/0x150
do_dentry_open+0x16b/0x3e0
path_openat+0x3c9/0xa00
do_filp_open+0x75/0x100
do_sys_openat2+0x8a/0x140
__x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #3 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820
__blkdev_get+0x6a/0x550
blkdev_get+0x85/0x150
blkdev_get_by_path+0x2c/0x70
btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs]
open_fs_devices+0x88/0x240 [btrfs]
btrfs_open_devices+0x92/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mount_root+0x250/0x490 [btrfs]
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
btrfs_mount+0x119/0x380 [btrfs]
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
do_mount+0x8c6/0xca0
__x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #2 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820
btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x36/0x420 [btrfs]
commit_cowonly_roots+0x91/0x2d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4e6/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_sync_file+0x38a/0x480 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_fdatasync+0x47/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x48e/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_sync_file+0x38a/0x480 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_fdatasync+0x47/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1241/0x20c0
lock_acquire+0xb0/0x400
__mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820
btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs]
start_transaction+0xd2/0x500 [btrfs]
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x44/0xd0 [btrfs]
file_update_time+0xc6/0x120
btrfs_page_mkwrite+0xda/0x560 [btrfs]
do_page_mkwrite+0x4f/0x130
do_wp_page+0x3b0/0x4f0
handle_mm_fault+0xf47/0x1850
do_user_addr_fault+0x1fc/0x4b0
exc_page_fault+0x88/0x300
asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&fs_info->reloc_mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> sb_pagefaults
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(sb_pagefaults);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
lock(sb_pagefaults);
lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by systemd-journal/509:
#0: ffff97083bdec8b8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: do_user_addr_fault+0x12e/0x4b0
#1: ffff97083144d598 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x59/0x560 [btrfs]
#2: ffff97083144d6a8 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3f8/0x500 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 509 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted 5.8.0-0.rc3.1.fc33.x86_64+debug #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x92/0xc8
check_noncircular+0x134/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1241/0x20c0
lock_acquire+0xb0/0x400
? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs]
? lock_acquire+0xb0/0x400
? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs]
__mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820
? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs]
? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30
? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0
btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs]
start_transaction+0xd2/0x500 [btrfs]
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x44/0xd0 [btrfs]
file_update_time+0xc6/0x120
btrfs_page_mkwrite+0xda/0x560 [btrfs]
? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
do_page_mkwrite+0x4f/0x130
do_wp_page+0x3b0/0x4f0
handle_mm_fault+0xf47/0x1850
do_user_addr_fault+0x1fc/0x4b0
exc_page_fault+0x88/0x300
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
RIP: 0033:0x7fa3972fdbfe
Code: Bad RIP value.
Fix this by not holding the ->device_list_mutex at this point. The
device_list_mutex exists to protect us from modifying the device list
while the file system is running.
However it can also be modified by doing a scan on a device. But this
action is specifically protected by the uuid_mutex, which we are holding
here. We cannot race with opening at this point because we have the
->s_mount lock held during the mount. Not having the
->device_list_mutex here is perfectly safe as we're not going to change
the devices at this point.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add some comments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Dave hit this splat during testing btrfs/078:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc6-default+ #1191 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/75 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffa040e9d04ff8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30
__kmalloc_track_caller+0x49/0x330
kstrdup+0x2e/0x60
__kernfs_new_node.constprop.0+0x44/0x250
kernfs_new_node+0x25/0x50
kernfs_create_link+0x34/0xa0
sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0
btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x65/0x100 [btrfs]
btrfs_init_new_device+0x44c/0x12b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0xc3c/0x25c0 [btrfs]
ksys_ioctl+0x68/0xa0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x137/0x3e0 [btrfs]
find_free_extent+0xb44/0xfb0 [btrfs]
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x350 [btrfs]
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs]
__btrfs_cow_block+0x143/0x7a0 [btrfs]
btrfs_cow_block+0x15f/0x310 [btrfs]
push_leaf_right+0x150/0x240 [btrfs]
split_leaf+0x3cd/0x6d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xd14/0xf70 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xc0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xb2/0x840 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x10e/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_work_helper+0x2f9/0x650 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x22c/0x600
worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
kthread+0x137/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20
validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00
__lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs]
evict+0xd6/0x1c0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420
shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
shrink_node+0x192/0x600
balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750
kswapd+0x206/0x510
kthread+0x137/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/75:
#0: ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
#1: ffffffff8b0b50b8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0
#2: ffffa040e057c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 75 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6-default+ #1191
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x16f/0x190
check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20
validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00
__lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
__mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
? __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
? btrfs_evict_inode+0x138/0x560 [btrfs]
? btrfs_evict_inode+0x2fe/0x560 [btrfs]
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs]
evict+0xd6/0x1c0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420
shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
shrink_node+0x192/0x600
balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750
kswapd+0x206/0x510
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x50
? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750
kthread+0x137/0x150
? kthread_stop+0x2a0/0x2a0
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This is because we're holding the chunk_mutex while adding this device
and adding its sysfs entries. We actually hold different locks in
different places when calling this function, the dev_replace semaphore
for instance in dev replace, so instead of moving this call around
simply wrap it's operations in NOFS.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Eric reported seeing this message while running generic/475
BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in btrfs_sync_log:3084: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted
Full stack trace:
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2323: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while writing out transaction)
BTRFS info (device dm-0): forced readonly
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
------------[ cut here ]------------
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1894: errno=-5 IO failure
BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -117)
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6480 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6488 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6490 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6498 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64a0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64a8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64b0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64b8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64c0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3572 rw 0,0 sector 0x1b85e8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3572 rw 0,0 sector 0x1b85f0 len 4096 err no 10
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 23985 at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:3084 btrfs_sync_log+0xbc8/0xd60 [btrfs]
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4288 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4290 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4298 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42a0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42a8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42b0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42b8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42c0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42c8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42d0 len 4096 err no 10
CPU: 3 PID: 23985 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W L 5.8.0-rc4-default+ #1181
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_sync_log+0xbc8/0xd60 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffff909a44d17bd0 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: ffff8f3be41cb940 RSI: ffffffffb0108d2b RDI: ffffffffb0108ff7
RBP: ffff909a44d17e70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000037988 R12: ffff8f3bd20e4000
R13: ffff8f3bd20e4428 R14: 00000000ffffff8b R15: ffff909a44d17c70
FS: 00007f6a6ed3fb80(0000) GS:ffff8f3c3dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6a6ed3e000 CR3: 00000000525c0003 CR4: 0000000000160ee0
Call Trace:
? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0
? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
? lockref_put_or_lock+0x9/0x30
? dput+0x20/0x4a0
? dput+0x20/0x4a0
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
btrfs_sync_file+0x335/0x490 [btrfs]
do_fsync+0x38/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7f6a6ef1b6e3
Code: Bad RIP value.
RSP: 002b:00007ffd01e20038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000007a120 RCX: 00007f6a6ef1b6e3
RDX: 00007ffd01e1ffa0 RSI: 00007ffd01e1ffa0 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffd01e2004c
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000009f
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
irq event stamp: 0
hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb007fe0b>] copy_process+0x67b/0x1b00
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb007fe0b>] copy_process+0x67b/0x1b00
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
---[ end trace af146e0e38433456 ]---
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_sync_log:3084: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted
This ret came from btrfs_write_marked_extents(). If we get an aborted
transaction via EIO before, we'll see it in btree_write_cache_pages()
and return EUCLEAN, which gets printed as "Filesystem corrupted".
Except we shouldn't be returning EUCLEAN here, we need to be returning
EROFS because EUCLEAN is reserved for actual corruption, not IO errors.
We are inconsistent about our handling of BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR
elsewhere, but we want to use EROFS for this particular case. The
original transaction abort has the real error code for why we ended up
with an aborted transaction, all subsequent actions just need to return
EROFS because they may not have a trans handle and have no idea about
the original cause of the abort.
After patch "btrfs: don't WARN if we abort a transaction with EROFS" the
stacktrace will not be dumped either.
Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add full test stacktrace ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We've had some discussions about what to do in certain scenarios for
error codes, specifically EUCLEAN and EROFS. Document these near the
error handling code so its clear what their intentions are.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we got some sort of corruption via a read and call
btrfs_handle_fs_error() we'll set BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR on the fs and
complain. If a subsequent trans handle trips over this it'll get EROFS
and then abort. However at that point we're not aborting for the
original reason, we're aborting because we've been flipped read only.
We do not need to WARN_ON() here.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The possibility of extents being shared (through clone and deduplication
operations) requires special care when logging data checksums, to avoid
having a log tree with different checksum items that cover ranges which
overlap (which resulted in missing checksums after replaying a log tree).
Such problems were fixed in the past by the following commits:
commit 40e046acbd2f ("Btrfs: fix missing data checksums after replaying a
log tree")
commit e289f03ea79b ("btrfs: fix corrupt log due to concurrent fsync of
inodes with shared extents")
Test case generic/588 exercises the scenario solved by the first commit
(purely sequential and deterministic) while test case generic/457 often
triggered the case fixed by the second commit (not deterministic, requires
specific timings under concurrency).
The problems were addressed by deleting, from the log tree, any existing
checksums before logging the new ones. And also by doing the deletion and
logging of the cheksums while locking the checksum range in an extent io
tree (root->log_csum_range), to deal with the case where we have concurrent
fsyncs against files with shared extents.
That however causes more contention on the leaves of a log tree where we
store checksums (and all the nodes in the paths leading to them), even
when we do not have shared extents, or all the shared extents were created
by past transactions. It also adds a bit of contention on the spin lock of
the log_csums_range extent io tree of the log root.
This change adds a 'last_reflink_trans' field to the inode to keep track
of the last transaction where a new extent was shared between inodes
(through clone and deduplication operations). It is updated for both the
source and destination inodes of reflink operations whenever a new extent
(created in the current transaction) becomes shared by the inodes. This
field is kept in memory only, not persisted in the inode item, similar
to other existing fields (last_unlink_trans, logged_trans).
When logging checksums for an extent, if the value of 'last_reflink_trans'
is smaller then the current transaction's generation/id, we skip locking
the extent range and deletion of checksums from the log tree, since we
know we do not have new shared extents. This reduces contention on the
log tree's leaves where checksums are stored.
The following script, which uses fio, was used to measure the impact of
this change:
$ cat test-fsync.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdk
MNT=/mnt/sdk
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd"
MKFS_OPTIONS="-d single -m single"
if [ $# -ne 3 ]; then
echo "Use $0 NUM_JOBS FILE_SIZE FSYNC_FREQ"
exit 1
fi
NUM_JOBS=$1
FILE_SIZE=$2
FSYNC_FREQ=$3
cat <<EOF > /tmp/fio-job.ini
[writers]
rw=write
fsync=$FSYNC_FREQ
fallocate=none
group_reporting=1
direct=0
bs=64k
ioengine=sync
size=$FILE_SIZE
directory=$MNT
numjobs=$NUM_JOBS
EOF
echo "Using config:"
echo
cat /tmp/fio-job.ini
echo
mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV
mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT
fio /tmp/fio-job.ini
umount $MNT
The tests were performed for different numbers of jobs, file sizes and
fsync frequency. A qemu VM using kvm was used, with 8 cores (the host has
12 cores, with cpu governance set to performance mode on all cores), 16GiB
of ram (the host has 64GiB) and using a NVMe device directly (without an
intermediary filesystem in the host). While running the tests, the host
was not used for anything else, to avoid disturbing the tests.
The obtained results were the following (the last line of fio's output was
pasted). Starting with 16 jobs is where a significant difference is
observable in this particular setup and hardware (differences highlighted
below). The very small differences for tests with less than 16 jobs are
possibly just noise and random.
**** 1 job, file size 1G, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=23.8MiB/s (24.9MB/s), 23.8MiB/s-23.8MiB/s (24.9MB/s-24.9MB/s), io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=43075-43075msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=24.4MiB/s (25.6MB/s), 24.4MiB/s-24.4MiB/s (25.6MB/s-25.6MB/s), io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=41938-41938msec
**** 2 jobs, file size 1G, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=37.7MiB/s (39.5MB/s), 37.7MiB/s-37.7MiB/s (39.5MB/s-39.5MB/s), io=2048MiB (2147MB), run=54351-54351msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=37.7MiB/s (39.5MB/s), 37.6MiB/s-37.6MiB/s (39.5MB/s-39.5MB/s), io=2048MiB (2147MB), run=54428-54428msec
**** 4 jobs, file size 1G, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=67.5MiB/s (70.8MB/s), 67.5MiB/s-67.5MiB/s (70.8MB/s-70.8MB/s), io=4096MiB (4295MB), run=60669-60669msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=68.6MiB/s (71.0MB/s), 68.6MiB/s-68.6MiB/s (71.0MB/s-71.0MB/s), io=4096MiB (4295MB), run=59678-59678msec
**** 8 jobs, file size 1G, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=128MiB/s (134MB/s), 128MiB/s-128MiB/s (134MB/s-134MB/s), io=8192MiB (8590MB), run=64048-64048msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=129MiB/s (135MB/s), 129MiB/s-129MiB/s (135MB/s-135MB/s), io=8192MiB (8590MB), run=63405-63405msec
**** 16 jobs, file size 1G, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=78.5MiB/s (82.3MB/s), 78.5MiB/s-78.5MiB/s (82.3MB/s-82.3MB/s), io=16.0GiB (17.2GB), run=208676-208676msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=110MiB/s (115MB/s), 110MiB/s-110MiB/s (115MB/s-115MB/s), io=16.0GiB (17.2GB), run=149295-149295msec
(+40.1% throughput, -28.5% runtime)
**** 32 jobs, file size 1G, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=58.8MiB/s (61.7MB/s), 58.8MiB/s-58.8MiB/s (61.7MB/s-61.7MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=557134-557134msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=76.1MiB/s (79.8MB/s), 76.1MiB/s-76.1MiB/s (79.8MB/s-79.8MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=430550-430550msec
(+29.4% throughput, -22.7% runtime)
**** 64 jobs, file size 512M, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=65.8MiB/s (68.0MB/s), 65.8MiB/s-65.8MiB/s (68.0MB/s-68.0MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=498055-498055msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=85.1MiB/s (89.2MB/s), 85.1MiB/s-85.1MiB/s (89.2MB/s-89.2MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=385116-385116msec
(+29.3% throughput, -22.7% runtime)
**** 128 jobs, file size 256M, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=54.7MiB/s (57.3MB/s), 54.7MiB/s-54.7MiB/s (57.3MB/s-57.3MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=599373-599373msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=121MiB/s (126MB/s), 121MiB/s-121MiB/s (126MB/s-126MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=271907-271907msec
(+121.2% throughput, -54.6% runtime)
**** 256 jobs, file size 256M, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=69.2MiB/s (72.5MB/s), 69.2MiB/s-69.2MiB/s (72.5MB/s-72.5MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=947536-947536msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=121MiB/s (127MB/s), 121MiB/s-121MiB/s (127MB/s-127MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=541916-541916msec
(+74.9% throughput, -42.8% runtime)
**** 512 jobs, file size 128M, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=85.4MiB/s (89.5MB/s), 85.4MiB/s-85.4MiB/s (89.5MB/s-89.5MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=767734-767734msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=141MiB/s (147MB/s), 141MiB/s-141MiB/s (147MB/s-147MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=466022-466022msec
(+65.1% throughput, -39.3% runtime)
**** 1024 jobs, file size 128M, fsync frequency 1 ****
before this change:
WRITE: bw=115MiB/s (120MB/s), 115MiB/s-115MiB/s (120MB/s-120MB/s), io=128GiB (137GB), run=1143775-1143775msec
after this change:
WRITE: bw=171MiB/s (180MB/s), 171MiB/s-171MiB/s (180MB/s-180MB/s), io=128GiB (137GB), run=764843-764843msec
(+48.7% throughput, -33.1% runtime)
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since there is not common cleanup run after the label it makes it
somewhat redundant.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This enum is the interface exposed to developers.
Although we have a detailed comment explaining the whole idea of space
flushing at the beginning of space-info.c, the exposed enum interface
doesn't have any comment.
Some corner cases, like BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL and
BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL can be interrupted by fatal signals, are
not explained at all.
So add some simple comments for these enums as a quick reference.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since most metadata reservation calls can return -EINTR when get
interrupted by fatal signal, we need to review the all the metadata
reservation call sites.
In relocation code, the metadata reservation happens in the following
sites:
- btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in merge_reloc_root()
merge_reloc_root() is a pretty critical section, we don't want to be
interrupted by signal, so change the flush status to
BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, so it won't get interrupted by signal.
Since such change can be ENPSPC-prone, also shrink the amount of
metadata to reserve least amount avoid deadly ENOSPC there.
- btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in reserve_metadata_space()
It calls with BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, which won't get interrupted
by signal.
- btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in prepare_to_relocate()
- btrfs_block_rsv_add() in prepare_to_relocate()
- btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in relocate_block_group()
- btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata() in relocate_file_extent_cluster()
- btrfs_start_transaction() in relocate_block_group()
- btrfs_start_transaction() in create_reloc_inode()
Can be interrupted by fatal signal and we can handle it easily.
For these call sites, just catch the -EINTR value in btrfs_balance()
and count them as canceled.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
relocation tree
[BUG]
There is a bug report about bad signal timing could lead to read-only
fs during balance:
BTRFS info (device xvdb): balance: start -d -m -s
BTRFS info (device xvdb): relocating block group 73001861120 flags metadata
BTRFS info (device xvdb): found 12236 extents, stage: move data extents
BTRFS info (device xvdb): relocating block group 71928119296 flags data
BTRFS info (device xvdb): found 3 extents, stage: move data extents
BTRFS info (device xvdb): found 3 extents, stage: update data pointers
BTRFS info (device xvdb): relocating block group 60922265600 flags metadata
BTRFS: error (device xvdb) in btrfs_drop_snapshot:5505: errno=-4 unknown
BTRFS info (device xvdb): forced readonly
BTRFS info (device xvdb): balance: ended with status: -4
[CAUSE]
The direct cause is the -EINTR from the following call chain when a
fatal signal is pending:
relocate_block_group()
|- clean_dirty_subvols()
|- btrfs_drop_snapshot()
|- btrfs_start_transaction()
|- btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill()
|- btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes()
|- __reserve_metadata_bytes()
|- wait_reserve_ticket()
|- prepare_to_wait_event();
|- ticket->error = -EINTR;
Normally this behavior is fine for most btrfs_start_transaction()
callers, as they need to catch any other error, same for the signal, and
exit ASAP.
However for balance, especially for the clean_dirty_subvols() case, we're
already doing cleanup works, getting -EINTR from btrfs_drop_snapshot()
could cause a lot of unexpected problems.
From the mentioned forced read-only report, to later balance error due
to half dropped reloc trees.
[FIX]
Fix this problem by using btrfs_join_transaction() if
btrfs_drop_snapshot() is called from relocation context.
Since btrfs_join_transaction() won't get interrupted by signal, we can
continue the cleanup.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>3
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Although btrfs balance can be canceled with "btrfs balance cancel"
command, it's still almost muscle memory to press Ctrl-C to cancel a
long running btrfs balance.
So allow btrfs balance to check signal to determine if it should exit.
The cancellation points are in known location and we're only adding one
more reason, so this should be safe.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's no cleanup that occurs so we can simply return 0 directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
User Forza reported on IRC that some invalid combinations of file
attributes are accepted by chattr.
The NODATACOW and compression file flags/attributes are mutually
exclusive, but they could be set by 'chattr +c +C' on an empty file. The
nodatacow will be in effect because it's checked first in
btrfs_run_delalloc_range.
Extend the flag validation to catch the following cases:
- input flags are conflicting
- old and new flags are conflicting
- initialize the local variable with inode flags after inode ls locked
Inode attributes take precedence over mount options and are an
independent setting.
Nocompress would be a no-op with nodatacow, but we don't want to mix
any compression-related options with nodatacow.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
->show_devname currently shows the lowest devid in the list. As the seed
devices have the lowest devid in the sprouted filesystem, the userland
tool such as findmnt end up seeing seed device instead of the device from
the read-writable sprouted filesystem. As shown below.
mount /dev/sda /btrfs
mount: /btrfs: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only.
findmnt --output SOURCE,TARGET,UUID /btrfs
SOURCE TARGET UUID
/dev/sda /btrfs 899f7027-3e46-4626-93e7-7d4c9ad19111
btrfs dev add -f /dev/sdb /btrfs
umount /btrfs
mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
findmnt --output SOURCE,TARGET,UUID /btrfs
SOURCE TARGET UUID
/dev/sda /btrfs 899f7027-3e46-4626-93e7-7d4c9ad19111
All sprouts from a single seed will show the same seed device and the
same fsid. That's confusing.
This is causing problems in our prototype as there isn't any reference
to the sprout file-system(s) which is being used for actual read and
write.
This was added in the patch which implemented the show_devname in btrfs
commit 9c5085c14798 ("Btrfs: implement ->show_devname").
I tried to look for any particular reason that we need to show the seed
device, there isn't any.
So instead, do not traverse through the seed devices, just show the
lowest devid in the sprouted fsid.
After the patch:
mount /dev/sda /btrfs
mount: /btrfs: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only.
findmnt --output SOURCE,TARGET,UUID /btrfs
SOURCE TARGET UUID
/dev/sda /btrfs 899f7027-3e46-4626-93e7-7d4c9ad19111
btrfs dev add -f /dev/sdb /btrfs
mount -o rw,remount /dev/sdb /btrfs
findmnt --output SOURCE,TARGET,UUID /btrfs
SOURCE TARGET UUID
/dev/sdb /btrfs 595ca0e6-b82e-46b5-b9e2-c72a6928be48
mount /dev/sda /btrfs1
mount: /btrfs1: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only.
btrfs dev add -f /dev/sdc /btrfs1
findmnt --output SOURCE,TARGET,UUID /btrfs1
SOURCE TARGET UUID
/dev/sdc /btrfs1 ca1dbb7a-8446-4f95-853c-a20f3f82bdbb
cat /proc/self/mounts | grep btrfs
/dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs rw,relatime,noacl,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0
/dev/sdc /btrfs1 btrfs ro,relatime,noacl,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0
Reported-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Tested-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
Sometime fsstress could lead to qgroup warning for case like
generic/013:
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): qgroup 0/259 has unreleased space, type 1 rsv 81920
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 24535 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4142 close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs]
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
RIP: 0010:close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110
kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs]
deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0
deactivate_super+0x40/0x50
cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190
__cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
task_work_run+0x64/0xb0
__prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0
__syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
---[ end trace 6c341cdf9b6cc3c1 ]---
BTRFS error (device dm-3): qgroup reserved space leaked
While that subvolume 259 is no longer in that filesystem.
[CAUSE]
Normally per-trans qgroup reserved space is freed when a transaction is
committed, in commit_fs_roots().
However for completely dropped subvolume, that subvolume is completely
gone, thus is no longer in the fs_roots_radix, and its per-trans
reserved qgroup will never be freed.
Since the subvolume is already gone, leaked per-trans space won't cause
any trouble for end users.
[FIX]
Just call btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_all_pertrans() before a subvolume is
completely dropped.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
clang static analysis flags this error
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:290:3: warning: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 're' [unix.Malloc]
kfree(be);
^~~~~
The problem is in this block of code:
if (root_objectid) {
struct root_entry *exist_re;
exist_re = insert_root_entry(&exist->roots, re);
if (exist_re)
kfree(re);
}
There is no 'else' block freeing when root_objectid is 0. Add the
missing kfree to the else branch.
Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The whole chunk tree is read at mount time so we can utilize readahead
to get the tree blocks to memory before we read the items. The idea is
from Robbie, but instead of updating search slot readahead, this patch
implements the chunk tree readahead manually from nodes on level 1.
We've decided to do specific readahead optimizations and then unify them
under a common API so we don't break everything by changing the search
slot readahead logic.
Higher chunk trees grow on large filesystems (many terabytes), and
prefetching just level 1 seems to be sufficient. Provided example was
from a 200TiB filesystem with chunk tree level 2.
CC: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Add retrieval of the filesystem's metadata UUID to the fsinfo ioctl.
This is driven by setting the BTRFS_FS_INFO_FLAG_METADATA_UUID flag in
btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args::flags.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Add retrieval of the filesystem's generation to the fsinfo ioctl. This is
driven by setting the BTRFS_FS_INFO_FLAG_GENERATION flag in
btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args::flags.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
With the recent addition of filesystem checksum types other than CRC32c,
it is not anymore hard-coded which checksum type a btrfs filesystem uses.
Up to now there is no good way to read the filesystem checksum, apart from
reading the filesystem UUI |
