summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/ubifs/recovery.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-12-04tree-wide: fix assorted typos all over the placeAndré Goddard Rosa
That is "success", "unknown", "through", "performance", "[re|un]mapping" , "access", "default", "reasonable", "[con]currently", "temperature" , "channel", "[un]used", "application", "example","hierarchy", "therefore" , "[over|under]flow", "contiguous", "threshold", "enough" and others. Signed-off-by: André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2009-09-10UBIFS: do not print scary error messages needlesslyArtem Bityutskiy
At the moment UBIFS print large and scary error messages and flash dumps in case of nearly any corruption, even if it is a recoverable corruption. For example, if the master node is corrupted, ubifs_scan() prints error dumps, then UBIFS recovers just fine and goes on. This patch makes UBIFS print scary error messages only in real cases, which are not recoverable. It adds 'quiet' argument to the 'ubifs_scan()' function, so the caller may ask 'ubi_scan()' not to print error messages if the caller is able to do recovery. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
2009-07-09UBIFS: fix corruption dumpArtem Bityutskiy
In the 'ubifs_recover_leb()' function, when we find corrupted empty space, we dump 8K starting from the offset where the last node ends. This is OK if the corrupted empty space is somewhere near that offset. But if the corruption is far at the end of the LEB, we will dump all 0xFF bytes and complitely ignore the interesting data. This is observed on a PPC ("kilauea") with NOR flash. This patch changes the behavior and teaches UBIFS to print only interesting data. I.e., now we find where corruption starts and start dumping from that offset. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
2009-07-09UBIFS: clean up free space checkingArtem Bityutskiy
recovery.c has 'is_empty()' helper and it is better to use this helper instead of re-implementing it in several places. This patch does this and removes some amount of unneeded code. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
2009-07-09UBIFS: small amendments in the LEB scanning codeArtem Bityutskiy
This patch fixes few minor things I've spotted while going through code: 1. Better document return codes 2. If 'ubifs_scan_a_node()' returns some thing we do not expect, treat this as an error. 3. Try to do recovery only when 'ubifs_scan()' returns %-EUCLEAN, not on any error. 4. If empty space starts at a non-aligned address, print a message. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
2009-05-29UBIFS: remove dead codeArtem Bityutskiy
UBIFS assumes that @c->min_io_size is 8 in case of NOR flash. This is because UBIFS alignes all nodes to 8-byte boundary, and maintaining @c->min_io_size introduced unnecessary complications. This patch removes senseless constructs like: if (c->min_io_size == 1) NOR-specific code Also, few commentaries amendments. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2009-03-31UBIFS: fix recovery bugAdrian Hunter
UBIFS did not recovery in a situation in which it could have. The relevant function assumed there could not be more nodes in an eraseblock after a corrupted node, but in fact the last (NAND) page written might contain anything. The correct approach is to check for empty space (0xFF bytes) from then on. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
2008-11-06UBIFS: fix compilation warningsArtem Bityutskiy
We print 'ino_t' type using '%lu' printk() placeholder, but this results in many warnings when compiling for Alpha platform. Fix this by adding (unsingned long) casts. Fixes these warnings: fs/ubifs/journal.c:693: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/journal.c:1131: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/dir.c:163: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/tnc.c:2680: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/tnc.c:2700: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/replay.c:1066: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:108: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:135: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:142: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:154: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:159: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:451: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:539: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:612: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:843: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/orphan.c:856: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1438: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1443: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1475: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1495: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:105: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:105: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:110: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:110: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:114: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:114: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:118: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:118: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1591: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1671: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1674: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1680: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1699: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1788: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1821: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1833: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1924: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1932: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1938: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1945: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1953: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1960: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1967: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1973: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1988: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:1991: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t' fs/ubifs/debug.c:2009: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'ino_t' Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2008-11-06UBIFS: endian handling fixes and annotationsHarvey Harrison
Noticed by sparse: fs/ubifs/file.c:75:2: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer fs/ubifs/file.c:629:4: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer fs/ubifs/dir.c:431:3: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer This should be checked to ensure the ubifs_assert is working as intended, I've done the suggested annotation in this patch. fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: expected int [signed] [assigned] tmp fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident> fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] atime_sec fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] ctime_sec fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] mtime_sec fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp This looks like a bugfix as your tmp was a u32 so there was truncation in the atime, mtime, ctime value, probably not intentional, add a tmp_le64 and use it here. fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32 fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32 fs/ubifs/key.h:419:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32 Read from the annotated union member instead. fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: got restricted __le32 [usertype] flags fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: expected restricted __le32 [usertype] flags fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags Do byteshifting at compile time of the flag value. Annotate the saved_flags as le32. fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast to restricted __le32 fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast from restricted __le64 Should be checked if the truncation was intentional, I've changed the printk to print the full width. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2008-07-15UBIFS: add new flash file systemArtem Bityutskiy
This is a new flash file system. See http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>