summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/dlm/recover.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-01-08dlm: change rsbtbl rwlock to spinlockDavid Teigland
The rwlock is almost always used in write mode, so there's no reason to not use a spinlock instead. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-02-04dlm: use proper type for ->ls_recover_bufAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-30dlm: keep cached master rsbs during recoveryDavid Teigland
To prevent the master of an rsb from changing rapidly, an unused rsb is kept on the "toss list" for a period of time to be reused. The toss list was being cleared completely for each recovery, which is unnecessary. Much of the benefit of the toss list can be maintained if nodes keep rsb's in their toss list that they are the master of. These rsb's need to be included when the resource directory is rebuilt during recovery. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2008-01-29dlm: use dlm prefix on alloc and free functionsDavid Teigland
The dlm functions in memory.c should use the dlm_ prefix. Also, use kzalloc/kfree directly for dlm_direntry's, removing the wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2007-02-05[DLM] fix master recoveryDavid Teigland
If master recovery happens on an rsb in one recovery sequence, then that sequence is aborted before lock recovery happens, then in the next sequence, we rely on the previous master recovery (which may now be invalid due to another node ignoring a lookup result) and go on do to the lock recovery where we get stuck due to an invalid master value. recovery cycle begins: master of rsb X has left nodes A and B send node C an rcom lookup for X to find the new master C gets lookup from B first, sets B as new master, and sends reply back to B C gets lookup from A next, and sends reply back to A saying B is master A gets lookup reply from C and sets B as the new master in the rsb recovery cycle on A, B and C is aborted to start a new recovery B gets lookup reply from C and ignores it since there's a new recovery recovery cycle begins: some other node has joined B doesn't think it's the master of X so it doesn't rebuild it in the directory C looks up the master of X, no one is master, so it becomes new master B looks up the master of X, finds it's C A believes that B is the master of X, so it sends its lock to B B sends an error back to A A resends this repeats forever, the incorrect master value on A is never corrected The fix is to do master recovery on an rsb that still has the NEW_MASTER flag set from an earlier recovery sequence, and therefore didn't complete lock recovery. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05[DLM] rename dlm_config_info fieldsDavid Teigland
Add a "ci_" prefix to the fields in the dlm_config_info struct so that we can use macros to add configfs functions to access them (in a later patch). No functional changes in this patch, just naming changes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30[DLM] res_recover_locks_count not reset when recover_locks is abortedDavid Teigland
Red Hat BZ 213684 If a node sends an lkb to the new master (RCOM_LOCK message) during recovery and recovery is then aborted on both nodes before it gets a reply, the res_recover_locks_count needs to be reset to 0 so that when the subsequent recovery comes along and sends the lkb to the new master again the assertion doesn't trigger that checks that counter is zero. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-24[DLM] recover_locks not clearing NEW_MASTER flagDavid Teigland
When there are no locks on a resource, the recover_locks() function fails to clear the NEW_MASTER flag by going directly to out, missing the line that clears the flag. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-21[DLM] dump rsb and locks on assertDavid Teigland
Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-07-26[DLM] set purged flag on rsbsDavid Teigland
If a node becomes the new master of an rsb during recovery, the LOCKS_PURGED flag needs to be set on it so that any waiting/converting locks will try to be granted. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-05-24[GFS2] Cast 64 bit printk args to unsigned long long.David Teigland
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-20[DLM] Update DLM to the latest patch levelDavid Teigland
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-01-18[DLM] The core of the DLM for GFS2/CLVMDavid Teigland
This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>