| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- fixes of error handling cleanup of metadata accounting with qgroups
enabled
- fix swapped values for qgroup tracepoints
- fix race when handling full sync flag
- don't start unused worker thread, functionality removed already
* tag 'for-5.4-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
Btrfs: check for the full sync flag while holding the inode lock during fsync
Btrfs: fix qgroup double free after failure to reserve metadata for delalloc
btrfs: tracepoints: Fix bad entry members of qgroup events
btrfs: tracepoints: Fix wrong parameter order for qgroup events
btrfs: qgroup: Always free PREALLOC META reserve in btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
btrfs: don't needlessly create extent-refs kernel thread
btrfs: block-group: Fix a memory leak due to missing btrfs_put_block_group()
Btrfs: add missing extents release on file extent cluster relocation error
|
|
We were checking for the full fsync flag in the inode before locking the
inode, which is racy, since at that that time it might not be set but
after we acquire the inode lock some other task set it. One case where
this can happen is on a system low on memory and some concurrent task
failed to allocate an extent map and therefore set the full sync flag on
the inode, to force the next fsync to work in full mode.
A consequence of missing the full fsync flag set is hitting the problems
fixed by commit 0c713cbab620 ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and
writeback of adjacent ranges"), BUG_ON() when dropping extents from a log
tree, hitting assertion failures at tree-log.c:copy_items() or all sorts
of weird inconsistencies after replaying a log due to file extents items
representing ranges that overlap.
So just move the check such that it's done after locking the inode and
before starting writeback again.
Fixes: 0c713cbab620 ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and writeback of adjacent ranges")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we fail to reserve metadata for delalloc operations we end up releasing
the previously reserved qgroup amount twice, once explicitly under the
'out_qgroup' label by calling btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() and once
again, under label 'out_fail', by calling btrfs_inode_rsv_release() with a
value of 'true' for its 'qgroup_free' argument, which results in
btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() being called again, so we end up having
a double free.
Also if we fail to reserve the necessary qgroup amount, we jump to the
label 'out_fail', which calls btrfs_inode_rsv_release() and that in turns
calls btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc(), even though we weren't able to
reserve any qgroup amount. So we freed some amount we never reserved.
So fix this by removing the call to btrfs_inode_rsv_release() in the
failure path, since it's not necessary at all as we haven't changed the
inode's block reserve in any way at this point.
Fixes: c8eaeac7b73434 ("btrfs: reserve delalloc metadata differently")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
For btrfs:qgroup_meta_reserve event, the trace event can output garbage:
qgroup_meta_reserve: 9c7f6acc-b342-4037-bc47-7f6e4d2232d7: refroot=5(FS_TREE) type=DATA diff=2
The diff should always be alinged to sector size (4k), so there is
definitely something wrong.
[CAUSE]
For the wrong @diff, it's caused by wrong parameter order.
The correct parameters are:
struct btrfs_root, s64 diff, int type.
However the parameters used are:
struct btrfs_root, int type, s64 diff.
Fixes: 4ee0d8832c2e ("btrfs: qgroup: Update trace events for metadata reservation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
[Background]
Btrfs qgroup uses two types of reserved space for METADATA space,
PERTRANS and PREALLOC.
PERTRANS is metadata space reserved for each transaction started by
btrfs_start_transaction().
While PREALLOC is for delalloc, where we reserve space before joining a
transaction, and finally it will be converted to PERTRANS after the
writeback is done.
[Inconsistency]
However there is inconsistency in how we handle PREALLOC metadata space.
The most obvious one is:
In btrfs_buffered_write():
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), reserve_bytes, true);
We always free qgroup PREALLOC meta space.
While in btrfs_truncate_block():
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, (ret != 0));
We only free qgroup PREALLOC meta space when something went wrong.
[The Correct Behavior]
The correct behavior should be the one in btrfs_buffered_write(), we
should always free PREALLOC metadata space.
The reason is, the btrfs_delalloc_* mechanism works by:
- Reserve metadata first, even it's not necessary
In btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata()
- Free the unused metadata space
Normally in:
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
|- btrfs_inode_rsv_release()
Here we do calculation on whether we should release or not.
E.g. for 64K buffered write, the metadata rsv works like:
/* The first page */
reserve_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
free_meta: num_bytes=0
total: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
/* The first page caused one outstanding extent, thus needs metadata
rsv */
/* The 2nd page */
reserve_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
free_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
total: not changed
/* The 2nd page doesn't cause new outstanding extent, needs no new meta
rsv, so we free what we have reserved */
/* The 3rd~16th pages */
reserve_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
free_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
total: not changed (still space for one outstanding extent)
This means, if btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() determines to free some
space, then those space should be freed NOW.
So for qgroup, we should call btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() other
than btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta().
The good news is:
- The callers are not that hot
The hottest caller is in btrfs_buffered_write(), which is already
fixed by commit 336a8bb8e36a ("btrfs: Fix wrong
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents parameter"). Thus it's not that
easy to cause false EDQUOT.
- The trans commit in advance for qgroup would hide the bug
Since commit f5fef4593653 ("btrfs: qgroup: Make qgroup async transaction
commit more aggressive"), when btrfs qgroup metadata free space is slow,
it will try to commit transaction and free the wrongly converted
PERTRANS space, so it's not that easy to hit such bug.
[FIX]
So to fix the problem, remove the @qgroup_free parameter for
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(), and always pass true to
btrfs_inode_rsv_release().
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Fixes: 43b18595d660 ("btrfs: qgroup: Use separate meta reservation type for delalloc")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The patch 32b593bfcb58 ("Btrfs: remove no longer used function to run
delayed refs asynchronously") removed the async delayed refs but the
thread has been created, without any use. Remove it to avoid resource
consumption.
Fixes: 32b593bfcb58 ("Btrfs: remove no longer used function to run delayed refs asynchronously")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In btrfs_read_block_groups(), if we have an invalid block group which
has mixed type (DATA|METADATA) while the fs doesn't have MIXED_GROUPS
feature, we error out without freeing the block group cache.
This patch will add the missing btrfs_put_block_group() to prevent
memory leak.
Note for stable backports: the file to patch in versions <= 5.3 is
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
Fixes: 49303381f19a ("Btrfs: bail out if block group has different mixed flag")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we error out when finding a page at relocate_file_extent_cluster(), we
need to release the outstanding extents counter on the relocation inode,
set by the previous call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(), otherwise
the inode's block reserve size can never decrease to zero and metadata
space is leaked. Therefore add a call to btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
in case we can't find the target page.
Fixes: 8b62f87bad9c ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A few more stabitly fixes, one build warning fix.
- fix inode allocation under NOFS context
- fix leak in fiemap due to concurrent append writes
- fix log-root tree updates
- fix balance convert of single profile on 32bit architectures
- silence false positive warning on old GCCs (code moved in rc1)"
* tag 'for-5.4-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: silence maybe-uninitialized warning in clone_range
btrfs: fix uninitialized ret in ref-verify
btrfs: allocate new inode in NOFS context
btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs
btrfs: fix incorrect updating of log root tree
Btrfs: fix memory leak due to concurrent append writes with fiemap
|
|
GCC throws warning message as below:
‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
^
fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here
u64 clone_src_i_size;
^
The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference
in a call to get_inode_info().
Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0.
Note that the warning is a false positive and reported by older versions
of GCC (eg. 7.x) but not eg 9.x. As there have been numerous people, the
patch is applied. Setting clone_src_i_size to 0 does not otherwise make
sense and would not do any action in case the code changes in the future.
Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Coverity caught a case where we could return with a uninitialized value
in ret in process_leaf. This is actually pretty likely because we could
very easily run into a block group item key and have a garbage value in
ret and think there was an errror. Fix this by initializing ret to 0.
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
A user reported a lockdep splat
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.2.11-gentoo #2 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/711 is trying to acquire lock:
000000007777a663 (sb_internal){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
but task is already holding lock:
000000000ba86300 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
kmem_cache_alloc+0x1f/0x1c0
btrfs_alloc_inode+0x1f/0x260
alloc_inode+0x16/0xa0
new_inode+0xe/0xb0
btrfs_new_inode+0x70/0x610
btrfs_symlink+0xd0/0x420
vfs_symlink+0x9c/0x100
do_symlinkat+0x66/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #0 (sb_internal){.+.+}:
__sb_start_write+0xf6/0x150
start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x59/0x110
btrfs_evict_inode+0x19e/0x4c0
evict+0xbc/0x1f0
inode_lru_isolate+0x113/0x190
__list_lru_walk_one.isra.4+0x5c/0x100
list_lru_walk_one+0x32/0x50
prune_icache_sb+0x36/0x80
super_cache_scan+0x14a/0x1d0
do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x320
shrink_node+0xf7/0x380
balance_pgdat+0x2d5/0x640
kswapd+0x2ba/0x5e0
kthread+0x147/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(sb_internal);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(sb_internal);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/711:
#0: 000000000ba86300 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30
#1: 000000004a5100f8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_node+0x9a/0x380
#2: 00000000f956fa46 (&type->s_umount_key#30){++++}, at: super_cache_scan+0x35/0x1d0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 PID: 711 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.2.11-gentoo #2
Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision Tower 3620/0MWYPT, BIOS 2.4.2 09/29/2017
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc7
print_circular_bug.cold.40+0x1d9/0x235
__lock_acquire+0x18b1/0x1f00
lock_acquire+0xa6/0x170
? start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
__sb_start_write+0xf6/0x150
? start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x59/0x110
btrfs_evict_inode+0x19e/0x4c0
? var_wake_function+0x20/0x20
evict+0xbc/0x1f0
inode_lru_isolate+0x113/0x190
? discard_new_inode+0xc0/0xc0
__list_lru_walk_one.isra.4+0x5c/0x100
? discard_new_inode+0xc0/0xc0
list_lru_walk_one+0x32/0x50
prune_icache_sb+0x36/0x80
super_cache_scan+0x14a/0x1d0
do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x320
shrink_node+0xf7/0x380
balance_pgdat+0x2d5/0x640
kswapd+0x2ba/0x5e0
? __wake_up_common_lock+0x90/0x90
kthread+0x147/0x160
? balance_pgdat+0x640/0x640
? __kthread_create_on_node+0x160/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
This is because btrfs_new_inode() calls new_inode() under the
transaction. We could probably move the new_inode() outside of this but
for now just wrap it in memalloc_nofs_save().
Reported-by: Zdenek Sojka <zsojka@seznam.cz>
Fixes: 712e36c5f2a7 ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently, the command:
btrfs balance start -dconvert=single,soft .
on a Raspberry Pi produces the following kernel message:
BTRFS error (device mmcblk0p2): balance: invalid convert data profile single
This fails because we use is_power_of_2(unsigned long) to validate
the new data profile, the constant for 'single' profile uses bit 48,
and there are only 32 bits in a long on ARM.
Fix by open-coding the check using u64 variables.
Tested by completing the original balance command on several Raspberry
Pis.
Fixes: 818255feece6 ("btrfs: use common helper instead of open coding a bit test")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.20+
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We've historically had reports of being unable to mount file systems
because the tree log root couldn't be read. Usually this is the "parent
transid failure", but could be any of the related errors, including
"fsid mismatch" or "bad tree block", depending on which block got
allocated.
The modification of the individual log root items are serialized on the
per-log root root_mutex. This means that any modification to the
per-subvol log root_item is completely protected.
However we update the root item in the log root tree outside of the log
root tree log_mutex. We do this in order to allow multiple subvolumes
to be updated in each log transaction.
This is problematic however because when we are writing the log root
tree out we update the super block with the _current_ log root node
information. Since these two operations happen independently of each
other, you can end up updating the log root tree in between writing out
the dirty blocks and setting the super block to point at the current
root.
This means we'll point at the new root node that hasn't been written
out, instead of the one we should be pointing at. Thus whatever garbage
or old block we end up pointing at complains when we mount the file
system later and try to replay the log.
Fix this by copying the log's root item into a local root item copy.
Then once we're safely under the log_root_tree->log_mutex we update the
root item in the log_root_tree. This way we do not modify the
log_root_tree while we're committing it, fixing the problem.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When we have a buffered write that starts at an offset greater than or
equals to the file's size happening concurrently with a full ranged
fiemap, we can end up leaking an extent state structure.
Suppose we have a file with a size of 1Mb, and before the buffered write
and fiemap are performed, it has a single extent state in its io tree
representing the range from 0 to 1Mb, with the EXTENT_DELALLOC bit set.
The following sequence diagram shows how the memory leak happens if a
fiemap a buffered write, starting at offset 1Mb and with a length of
4Kb, are performed concurrently.
CPU 1 CPU 2
extent_fiemap()
--> it's a full ranged fiemap
range from 0 to LLONG_MAX - 1
(9223372036854775807)
--> locks range in the inode's
io tree
--> after this we have 2 extent
states in the io tree:
--> 1 for range [0, 1Mb[ with
the bits EXTENT_LOCKED and
EXTENT_DELALLOC_BITS set
--> 1 for the range
[1Mb, LLONG_MAX[ with
the EXTENT_LOCKED bit set
--> start buffered write at offset
1Mb with a length of 4Kb
btrfs_file_write_iter()
btrfs_buffered_write()
--> cached_state is NULL
lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need()
--> returns 0 and does not lock
range because it starts
at current i_size / eof
--> cached_state remains NULL
btrfs_dirty_pages()
btrfs_set_extent_delalloc()
(...)
__set_extent_bit()
--> splits extent state for range
[1Mb, LLONG_MAX[ and now we
have 2 extent states:
--> one for the range
[1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[ with
EXTENT_LOCKED set
--> another one for the range
[1Mb + 4Kb, LLONG_MAX[ with
EXTENT_LOCKED set as well
--> sets EXTENT_DELALLOC on the
extent state for the range
[1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[
--> caches extent state
[1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[ into
@cached_state because it has
the bit EXTENT_LOCKED set
--> btrfs_buffered_write() ends up
with a non-NULL cached_state and
never calls anything to release its
reference on it, resulting in a
memory leak
Fix this by calling free_extent_state() on cached_state if the range was
not locked by lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need().
The same issue can happen if anything else other than fiemap locks a range
that covers eof and beyond.
This could be triggered, sporadically, by test case generic/561 from the
fstests suite, which makes duperemove run concurrently with fsstress, and
duperemove does plenty of calls to fiemap. When CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is set
the leak is reported in dmesg/syslog when removing the btrfs module with
a message like the following:
[77100.039461] BTRFS: state leak: start 6574080 end 6582271 state 16402 in tree 0 refs 1
Otherwise (CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG not set) detectable with kmemleak.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A bunch of fixes that accumulated in recent weeks, mostly material for
stable.
Summary:
- fix for regression from 5.3 that prevents to use balance convert
with single profile
- qgroup fixes: rescan race, accounting leak with multiple writers,
potential leak after io failure recovery
- fix for use after free in relocation (reported by KASAN)
- other error handling fixups"
* tag 'for-5.4-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: qgroup: Fix reserved data space leak if we have multiple reserve calls
btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space
btrfs: Fix a regression which we can't convert to SINGLE profile
btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation roots
Btrfs: fix race setting up and completing qgroup rescan workers
Btrfs: fix missing error return if writeback for extent buffer never started
btrfs: adjust dirty_metadata_bytes after writeback failure of extent buffer
Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes
|
|
[BUG]
The following script can cause btrfs qgroup data space leak:
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt
btrfs subv create $mnt/subv
btrfs quota en $mnt
btrfs quota rescan -w $mnt
btrfs qgroup limit 128m $mnt/subv
for (( i = 0; i < 3; i++)); do
# Create 3 64M holes for latter fallocate to fail
truncate -s 192m $mnt/subv/file
xfs_io -c "pwrite 64m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null
xfs_io -c "pwrite 128m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null
sync
# it's supposed to fail, and each failure will leak at least 64M
# data space
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 192m" $mnt/subv/file &> /dev/null
rm $mnt/subv/file
sync
done
# Shouldn't fail after we removed the file
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 64m" $mnt/subv/file
[CAUSE]
Btrfs qgroup data reserve code allow multiple reservations to happen on
a single extent_changeset:
E.g:
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_1M);
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, SZ_1M, SZ_2M);
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_4M);
Btrfs qgroup code has its internal tracking to make sure we don't
double-reserve in above example.
The only pattern utilizing this feature is in the main while loop of
btrfs_fallocate() function.
However btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data()'s error handling has a bug in that
on error it clears all ranges in the io_tree with EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED
flag but doesn't free previously reserved bytes.
This bug has a two fold effect:
- Clearing EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED ranges
This is the correct behavior, but it prevents
btrfs_qgroup_check_reserved_leak() to catch the leakage as the
detector is purely EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag based.
- Leak the previously reserved data bytes.
The bug manifests when N calls to btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data are made and
the last one fails, leaking space reserved in the previous ones.
[FIX]
Also free previously reserved data bytes when btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data
fails.
Fixes: 524725537023 ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data function")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
Under the following case with qgroup enabled, if some error happened
after we have reserved delalloc space, then in error handling path, we
could cause qgroup data space leakage:
From btrfs_truncate_block() in inode.c:
ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, &data_reserved,
block_start, blocksize);
if (ret)
goto out;
again:
page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, mask);
if (!page) {
btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
block_start, blocksize, true);
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, true);
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
[CAUSE]
In the above case, btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() will call
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() and mark the io_tree range with
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag.
In the error handling path, we have the following call stack:
btrfs_delalloc_release_space()
|- btrfs_free_reserved_data_space()
|- btrsf_qgroup_free_data()
|- __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(reserved=@reserved, free=1)
|- qgroup_free_reserved_data(reserved=@reserved)
|- clear_record_extent_bits();
|- freed += changeset.bytes_changed;
However due to a completion bug, qgroup_free_reserved_data() will clear
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag in BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree, other
than the correct BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.
Since io_failure_tree is never marked with that flag,
btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will not free any data reserved space at all,
causing a leakage.
This type of error handling can only be triggered by errors outside of
qgroup code. So EDQUOT error from qgroup can't trigger it.
[FIX]
Fix the wrong target io_tree.
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Fixes: bc42bda22345 ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
With v5.3 kernel, we can't convert to SINGLE profile:
# btrfs balance start -f -dconvert=single $mnt
ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt/btrfs': Invalid argument
# dmesg -t | tail
validate_convert_profile: data profile=0x1000000000000 allowed=0x20 is_valid=1 final=0x1000000000000 ret=1
BTRFS error (device dm-3): balance: invalid convert data profile single
[CAUSE]
With the extra debug output added, it shows that the @allowed bit is
lacking the special in-memory only SINGLE profile bit.
Thus we fail at that (profile & ~allowed) check.
This regression is caused by commit 081db89b13cb ("btrfs: use raid_attr
to get allowed profiles for balance conversion") and the fact that we
don't use any bit to indicate SINGLE profile on-disk, but uses special
in-memory only bit to help distinguish different profiles.
[FIX]
Add that BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE to @allowed, so the code should be
the same as it was and fix the regression.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: 081db89b13cb ("btrfs: use raid_attr to get allowed profiles for balance conversion")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.3+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
One user reported a reproducible KASAN report about use-after-free:
BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: start -dvrange=1256811659264..1256811659265
BTRFS info (device sdi1): relocating block group 1256811659264 flags data|raid0
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
Write of size 8 at addr ffff88856f671710 by task kworker/u24:10/261579
CPU: 2 PID: 261579 Comm: kworker/u24:10 Tainted: P OE 5.2.11-arch1-1-kasan #4
Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./X99 Extreme4, BIOS P3.80 04/06/2018
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7b/0xba
print_address_description+0x6c/0x22e
? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
__kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x3b
? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
kasan_report+0x12/0x17
__asan_report_store8_noabort+0x17/0x20
btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs]
btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs]
start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs]
btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7bf/0x18a0 [btrfs]
? lock_repin_lock+0x400/0x400
? __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x140/0x1ad
? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0x9b0/0x9b0 [btrfs]
finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
normal_work_helper+0x1bd/0xca0 [btrfs]
? process_one_work+0x819/0x1720
? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x8c9/0x1720
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2f0/0x2f0
? worker_thread+0x1d9/0x1030
worker_thread+0x98/0x1030
kthread+0x2bb/0x3b0
? process_one_work+0x1720/0x1720
? kthread_park+0x120/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Allocated by task 369692:
__kasan_kmalloc.part.0+0x44/0xc0
__kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xba/0xc0
kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x260
btrfs_read_tree_root+0x92/0x360 [btrfs]
btrfs_read_fs_root+0x10/0xb0 [btrfs]
create_reloc_root+0x47d/0xa10 [btrfs]
btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x1e2/0x340 [btrfs]
record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs]
btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs]
start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_transaction+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1c2/0xa00 [btrfs]
btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
prealloc_file_extent_cluster+0x29f/0x570 [btrfs]
relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x193/0xc30 [btrfs]
relocate_data_extent+0x1f8/0x490 [btrfs]
relocate_block_group+0x600/0x1060 [btrfs]
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs]
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs]
btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060
ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Freed by task 369692:
__kasan_slab_free+0x14f/0x210
kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
kfree+0xd8/0x270
btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x154c/0x1eb0 [btrfs]
clean_dirty_subvols+0x227/0x340 [btrfs]
relocate_block_group+0x972/0x1060 [btrfs]
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs]
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs]
btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060
ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88856f671100
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096
The buggy address is located 1552 bytes inside of
4096-byte region [ffff88856f671100, ffff88856f672100)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea0015bd9c00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88864400e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
flags: 0x2ffff0000010200(slab|head)
raw: 02ffff0000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88864400e600
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff88856f671600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff88856f671680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>ffff88856f671700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
ffff88856f671780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff88856f671800: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================
BTRFS info (device sdi1): 1 enospc errors during balance
BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: ended with status: -28
[CAUSE]
The problem happens when finish_ordered_io() get called with balance
still running, while the reloc root of that subvolume is already dead.
(Tree is swap already done, but tree not yet deleted for possible qgroup
usage.)
That means root->reloc_root still exists, but that reloc_root can be
under btrfs_drop_snapshot(), thus we shouldn't access it.
The following race could cause the use-after-free problem:
CPU1 | CPU2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| relocate_block_group()
| |- unset_reloc_control(rc)
| |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() | |- clean_dirty_subvols()
|- btrfs_join_transaction() | |
|- record_root_in_trans() | |
|- btrfs_init_reloc_root() | |
|- if (root->reloc_root) | |
| | |- root->reloc_root = NULL
| | |- btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root);
|- reloc_root->last_trans|
= trans->transid |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Use after free
[FIX]
Fix it by the following modifications:
- Test if the root has dead reloc tree before accessing root->reloc_root
If the root has BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, then we don't need to
create or update root->reloc_tree
- Clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag until we have fully dropped
reloc tree
To co-operate with above modification, so as long as
BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE is still set, we won't try to re-create
reloc tree at record_root_in_trans().
Reported-by: Cebtenzzre <cebtenzzre@gmail.com>
Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is a race between setting up a qgroup rescan worker and completing
a qgroup rescan worker that can lead to callers of the qgroup rescan wait
ioctl to either not wait for the rescan worker to complete or to hang
forever due to missing wake ups. The following diagram shows a sequence
of steps that illustrates the race.
CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3
btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan()
btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
qgroup_rescan_init()
mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)
fs_info->qgroup_flags |=
BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN
init_completion(
&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)
btrfs_init_work()
--> starts the worker
btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker()
mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
fs_info->qgroup_flags &=
~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
starts transaction, updates qgroup status
item, etc
btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan()
btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
qgroup_rescan_init()
mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)
fs_info->qgroup_flags |=
BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN
init_completion(
&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)
btrfs_init_work()
--> starts another worker
mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = false
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
complete_all(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)
Before the rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, if
another task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan(), it will get -EINPROGRESS
because the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN is set at
fs_info->qgroup_flags, which is expected and correct behaviour.
However if other task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_wait() before the
rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, it will return
immediately without waiting for the new rescan worker to complete,
because fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running is set to false by CPU 2.
This race is making test case btrfs/171 (from fstests) to fail often:
btrfs/171 9s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad)
--- tests/btrfs/171.out 2018-09-16 21:30:48.505104287 +0100
+++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad 2019-09-19 02:01:36.938486039 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
QA output created by 171
+ERROR: quota rescan failed: Operation now in progress
Silence is golden
...
(Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/171.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
That is because the test calls the btrfs-progs commands "qgroup quota
rescan -w", "qgroup assign" and "qgroup remove" in a sequence that makes
calls to the rescan start ioctl fail with -EINPROGRESS (note the "btrfs"
commands 'qgroup assign' and 'qgroup remove' often call the rescan start
ioctl after calling the qgroup assign ioctl,
btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_assign()), since previous waits didn't actually wait
for a rescan worker to complete.
Another problem the race can cause is missing wake ups for waiters,
since the call to complete_all() happens outside a critical section and
after clearing the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN. In the sequence
diagram above, if we have a waiter for the first rescan task (executed
by CPU 2), then fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion.wait is not empty, and
if after the rescan worker clears BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and
before it calls complete_all() against
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion, the task at CPU 3 calls
init_completion() against fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion which
re-initilizes its wait queue to an empty queue, therefore causing the
rescan worker at CPU 2 to call complete_all() against an empty queue,
never waking up the task waiting for that rescan worker.
Fix this by clearing BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and setting
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running to false in the same critical section,
delimited by the mutex fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock, as well as doing the
call to complete_all() in that same critical section. This gives the
protection needed to avoid rescan wait ioctl callers not waiting for a
running rescan worker and the lost wake ups problem, since setting that
rescan flag and boolean as well as initializing the wait queue is done
already in a critical section delimited by that mutex (at
qgroup_rescan_init()).
Fixes: 57254b6ebce4ce ("Btrfs: add ioctl to wait for qgroup rescan completion")
Fixes: d2c609b834d62f ("btrfs: properly track when rescan worker is running")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If lock_extent_buffer_for_io() fails, it returns a negative value, but its
caller btree_write_cache_pages() ignores such error. This means that a
call to flush_write_bio(), from lock_extent_buffer_for_io(), might have
failed. We should make btree_write_cache_pages() notice such error values
and stop immediatelly, making sure filemap_fdatawrite_range() returns an
error to the transaction commit path. A failure from flush_write_bio()
should also result in the endio callback end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage()
being invoked, which sets the BTRFS_FS_*_ERR bits appropriately, so that
there's no risk a transaction or log commit doesn't catch a writeback
failure.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Before, if a eb failed to write out, we would end up triggering a
BUG_ON(). As of f4340622e0226 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in
flush_write_bio() one level up"), we no longer BUG_ON(), so we should
make life consistent and add back the unwritten bytes to
dirty_metadata_bytes.
Fixes: f4340622e022 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Some of the self tests create a test inode, setup some extents and then do
calls to btrfs_get_extent() to test that the corresponding extent maps
exist and are correct. However btrfs_get_extent(), since the 5.2 merge
window, now errors out when it finds a regular or prealloc extent for an
inode that does not correspond to a regular file (its ->i_mode is not
S_IFREG). This causes the self tests to fail sometimes, specially when
KASAN, slub_debug and page poisoning are enabled:
$ modprobe btrfs
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Invalid argument
$ dmesg
[ 9414.691648] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-intel, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on
[ 9414.692655] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 4096
[ 9414.692658] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests
[ 9414.692918] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests
[ 9414.693061] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests
[ 9414.693366] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests
[ 9414.696455] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests
[ 9414.697131] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests
[ 9414.697133] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests
[ 9414.697564] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests
[ 9414.697583] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests
[ 9415.081125] BTRFS: selftest: running find_first_clear_extent_bit test
[ 9415.081278] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests
[ 9415.124192] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests
[ 9415.124195] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests
[ 9415.127909] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test
[ 9415.128343] BTRFS critical (device (efault)): regular/prealloc extent found for non-regular inode 256
[ 9415.131428] BTRFS: selftest: fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c:904 expected a real extent, got 0
This happens because the test inodes are created without ever initializing
the i_mode field of the inode, and neither VFS's new_inode() nor the btrfs
callback btrfs_alloc_inode() initialize the i_mode. Initialization of the
i_mode is done through the various callbacks used by the VFS to create
new inodes (regular files, directories, symlinks, tmpfiles, etc), which
all call btrfs_new_inode() which in turn calls inode_init_owner(), which
sets the inode's i_mode. Since the tests only uses new_inode() to create
the test inodes, the i_mode was never initialized.
This always happens on a VM I used with kasan, slub_debug and many other
debug facilities enabled. It also happened to someone who reported this
on bugzilla (on a 5.3-rc).
Fix this by setting i_mode to S_IFREG at btrfs_new_test_inode().
Fixes: 6bf9e4bd6a2778 ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204397
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"This continues with work on code refactoring, sanity checks and space
handling. There are some less user visible changes, nothing that would
particularly stand out.
User visible changes:
- tree checker, more sanity checks of:
- ROOT_ITEM (key, size, generation, level, alignment, flags)
- EXTENT_ITEM and METADATA_ITEM checks (key, size, offset,
alignment, refs)
- tree block reference items
- EXTENT_DATA_REF (key, hash, offset)
- deprecate flag BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC for subvolume creation
ioctl, scheduled removal in 5.7
- delete stale and unused UAPI definitions
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_ITEM_STATE_*
- improved export of debugging information available via existing
sysfs directory structure
- try harder to delete relations between qgroups and allow to delete
orphan entries
- remove unreliable space checks before relocation starts
Core:
- space handling:
- improved ticket reservations and other high level logic in
order to remove special cases
- factor flushing infrastructure and use it for different
contexts, allows to remove some special case handling
- reduce metadata reservation when only updating inodes
- reduce global block reserve minimum size (affects small
filesystems)
- improved overcommit logic wrt global block reserve
- tests:
- fix memory leaks in extent IO tree
- catch all TRIM range
Fixes:
- fix ENOSPC errors, leading to transaction aborts, when cloning
extents
- several fixes for inode number cache (mount option inode_cache)
- fix potential soft lockups during send when traversing large trees
- fix unaligned access to space cache pages with SLUB debug on
(PowerPC)
Other:
- refactoring public/private functions, moving to new or more
appropriate files
- defines converted to enums
- error handling improvements
- more assertions and comments
- old code deletion"
* tag 'for-5.4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (138 commits)
btrfs: Relinquish CPUs in btrfs_compare_trees
btrfs: Don't assign retval of btrfs_try_tree_write_lock/btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic
btrfs: create structure to encode checksum type and length
btrfs: turn checksum type define into an enum
btrfs: add enospc debug messages for ticket failure
btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit
btrfs: use btrfs_try_granting_tickets in update_global_rsv
btrfs: always reserve our entire size for the global reserve
btrfs: change the minimum global reserve size
btrfs: rename btrfs_space_info_add_old_bytes
btrfs: remove orig_bytes from reserve_ticket
btrfs: fix may_commit_transaction to deal with no partial filling
btrfs: rework wake_all_tickets
btrfs: refactor the ticket wakeup code
btrfs: stop partially refilling tickets when releasing space
btrfs: add space reservation tracepoint for reserved bytes
btrfs: roll tracepoint into btrfs_space_info_update helper
btrfs: do not allow reservations if we have pending tickets
btrfs: stop clearing EXTENT_DIRTY in inode I/O tree
btrfs: treat RWF_{,D}SYNC writes as sync for CRCs
...
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"Here are two fixes, one of them urgent fixing a bug introduced in 5.2
and reported by many users. It took time to identify the root cause,
catching the 5.3 release is higly desired also to push the fix to 5.2
stable tree.
The bug is a mess up of return values after adding proper error
handling and honestly the kind of bug that can cause sleeping
disorders until it's caught. My appologies to everybody who was
affected.
Summary of what could happen:
1) either a hang when committing a transaction, if this happens
there's no risk of corruption, still the hang is very inconvenient
and can't be resolved without a reboot
2) writeback for some btree nodes may never be started and we end up
committing a transaction without noticing that, this is really
serious and that will lead to the "parent transid verify failed"
messages"
* tag 'for-5.3-rc8-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
Btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffers and hangs on future writeback attempts
Btrfs: fix assertion failure during fsync and use of stale |
