| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In order to help debugging in field, we add some log messages.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109090123.9254-2-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
I'm not a standards expert, but this really looks to be undefined
behavior, when chip->dig_cck may be NULL. (And, we're trying to do a
NULL check a few lines down, because some chip variants will use NULL.)
Fixes: fc637a860a82 ("rtw88: 8723d: Set IG register for CCK rate")
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821211716.1631556-1-briannorris@chromium.org
|
|
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1].
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821064959.GA23693@embeddedor
|
|
In the current design, various chip functions and tables
are built into rtw88 core. That causes kernel to load its
functionalities even if a chip isn't currently used. We
plan to make each chip's functionalities a separate
kernel module to reduce rtw88 core. And kernel will be
able to load the necessary.
Before extracting chip functionalities, we export symbols
inside rtw88 core which will be used in chip modules.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515052327.31874-2-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
When chip's temperature is changed, RF characters are changed. To keep the
characters to be consistent, 8723d uses thermal meter to assist in
calibrating LCK, IQK, crystal and TX power.
A base thermal value is programmed in efuse, all calibration data in
MP process is based on this thermal value. So we calucate the delta of
thermal value between the base value, and use this delta to reference XTAL
and TX power offset tables to know how much we need to adjust.
For IQK and LCK, driver checks if delta of thermal value is over 8, then
they are triggered.
For crystal adjustment, when delta of thermal value is changed, we check
XTAL tables to get offset of XTAL value. If thermal value is larger than
base value, positive table (_p as suffix) is used. Otherwise, we use
negative table (_n as suffix). Then, we add offset to XTAL default value
programmed in efuse, and write sum value to register.
To compensate TX power, there are two hierarchical tables. First level use
delta of thermal value to access eight tables to yield delta of TX power
index. Then, plus base TX power index to get index of BB swing table
(second level tables) where register value is induced.
BB swing table can't deal with all cases, if index of BB swing table is
over the size of the table. In this case, TX AGC is used to compensate the
remnant part. Assume 'upper' is the upper bound of BB swing table, and
'target' is the desired index. Then, we can illustrate them as
compensation method BB swing TX AGC
------------------- -------- --------------
target > upper upper target - upper
target < 0 0 target
otherwise target 0
For debug purpose, add a column 'rem' to tx_pwr_tbl entry, and it looks
like
path rate pwr base (byr lmt ) rem
A CCK_1M 32(0x20) 34 -2 ( 0 -2) 0
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
IQ calibration is used to calibrate RF characteristic to yield expected
performance. Basically, we do calibration twice and compare the similarity
to determine calibration is good or not, if not we do the third
calibration, and then compare with the results of first and second
calibration. If it still not similar, IQK is failed.
Before doing calibration, we need to backup registers that will be
modified in calibration procedure, and restore these registers after
calibration is done.
A calibration procedure can divided into four sub-procedures that are
S1-TX, S1-RX, S0-TX and S0-RX. Where, S1 and S0 represent to path A and B
respectively. Each sub-procedure configure proper registers, and then
rigger one-shot calibration and poll until completion. For RX calibration,
it needs to do twice one-shot calibration, first one is to yield parameter
used by second one.
The result of TX part is stored for TX power tracking that adjusts TX AGC
to output expected power.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
DIG sets only one IG register for most chips, but 8723D need to set
additional register for CCK rate.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200504105010.10780-8-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
8723D use SIPI to indirectly read RF register instead of directly read,
so introduce a new struct rtw_rf_sipi_addr and new function
rtw_phy_read_rf_sipi(). Since other chips don't use the new function,
only 8723D needs to fill struct rtw_rf_sipi_addr in rtw_chip_info.
Because there are two kinds of functions for reading RF registers now,
change rtw_phy_read_rf() to chip->ops->read_rf() in
rtw_phy_write_rf_reg_sipi() so that we can switch tp proper RF read
functions depends on the type of the chip.
Though 8723D is an 1x1 chip, it has two RF PHY and we can switch to
one of them, and that should be configured properly. Hence, add a
fix_rf_phy_num to struct rtw_chip_info to allow driver to set one of
the PHY's registers for 8723D, even it is only 1x1. Another variable
rf_phy_num is introduced to keep the constraint number of RF path we
can access, and its value is:
rf_phy_num = (fix_rf_phy_num ? fix_rf_phy_num : rf_path_num)
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420055054.14592-5-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
According to some experiments, the original RF register protection
setting of 8822c cannot perfectly make sure that there is no hardware
PI write (direct) during direct write. Modify the setting so that the
hardware block of PI would be turned off via rtw8822c_rstb_3wire()
during the direct write, to avoid RF register racing.
Note that 8822b uses SIPI write (indirect), so 8822b does not
have such problem.
Signed-off-by: Chien-Hsun Liao <ben.liao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1437:1-24: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The checks to see if swing_table->n or swing_table->p are null are
redundant since n and p are arrays and can never be null if
swing_table is non-null. I believe these are redundant checks
and can be safely removed, especially the checks implies that these
are not arrays which can lead to confusion.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Array compared against 0")
Fixes: c97ee3e0bea2 ("rtw88: add power tracking support")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The level of cckpd is from 0 to 4, and it is the index of
array pd_lvl[] and cs_lvl[]. However, the length of both arrays
are 4, which is smaller than the possible maximum input index.
Enumerate cck level to make sure the max level will not be wrong
if new level is added in future.
Fixes: 479c4ee931a6 ("rtw88: add dynamic cck pd mechanism")
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Use proper struct for BB PG tables.
TODO: we need to find a way to store the tables that have
condition values.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
This commit adds several Tx/Rx physical information to phy_info
debugfs for 8822B/8822C. By this debugfs, we can know physical
information, such as Tx/Rx rate, RSSI, EVM,SNR, etc. The
information is gotten from the packets of Tx/Rx path. It has
no impact for the performance of 8822B/8822C.
In the fields, we may meet different kinds of problems, but
we may have no professional instrument to check them. At
this moment, this debugfs is a good tool, and it may provide
useful information for debug.
Signed-off-by: Tsang-Shian Lin <thlin@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The temperature of the chip can affect the output power
of the RF components. Hence driver requires to compensate
the power by adjusting the power index recorded in the
power swing table.
And if the difference of current thermal value to the
default thermal value exceeds a threshold, the RF IQK
should be triggered to re-calibrate the characteristics
of the RF components, to keep the output IQ vectors of
the RF components orthogonal enough.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Add macros to see which band we are, based on the current channel.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
These helper functions seems useless. And in some cases
we want to use test_and_[set/clear]_bit, these helpers
will make the code more complicated. So remove them.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
This mechanism reduces the numbers of false alram in cck rate by
dynamically adjusting the value of power threshold and cs_ratio.
We determine the new value by three factors, which are rssi, false alarm
count and igi. Based on these factors, we define the current condition
into five levels. Compared to the previous level, if the level is changed,
we set the new values for power threshold and cs_ratio.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Power amplifiers are not linear components, and require DPK to
reduce its nonlinearity. DPK is called Digital Pre-distortion
Calibration, can be used to compensate the output of power.
DPK tracking is in charge of tracking the thermal changes. And
it then shifts the power curve accordingly, which makes the
power output remains linear even if the PA works in different
temperature.
To perform DPK, the parameter table should also be updated.
And the table will be applied when device is powered on.
Then DPK will reference the values to calibrate.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
We're just trusting that these tables are of the right dimensions, when
we could do better by just using the struct directly. Let's expose the
struct txpwr_lmt_cfg_pair instead.
The table changes were made by using some Vim macros, so that should
help prevent any translation mistakes along the way.
Remaining work: get the 'void *data' out of the generic struct
rtw_table; all of these tables really deserve to be their own data
structure, with proper type fields.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Add a structure for power parameters including base,
offset, limit and a function to get tx power parameters.
Then, refine flow to get tx power index through the
function.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Since this macro definition has different values in different chipset,
the current defined macro value is for 8822b. This will cause the
settings of 8822c be incorrect.
Remove RTW_MAX_POWER_INDEX and use max_power_index in struct rtw_chip_info
to make sure the value of different chipset is right.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
If phy rate is decreased, sub bandwidth may be chosen by RA.
We consider possible power limits and apply the min one;
otherwise, the tx power index may be larger than spec.
And we cross-reference power limits of vht and ht with
20/40M bandwidth in 5G to avoid values are not assigned.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
When we are loading tx power limit from the power limit table, compare
the world-wide limit with the current limit and choose the lowest power
limit for the world-wide power settings.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Tx power limit is stored separately by 2G and 5G.
But driver did not get tx power limit from 5G and causes incorrect tx
power. Check if the channel is beyond 2G and get the corresponding tx
power limit.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The orig variable is taken but not used, remove it
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Rename the function names to make them have the same prefix "rtw_phy"
for the tx power setting routines. Only the function names and
corresponding identation are modified.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The type change from (void *) to (struct rtw_dev *) is redundant.
Just pass the right type and compiler can check that for us.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Some functions that should be static are unnecessarily exposed, remove
their declaration in header file phy.h.
After resolving their declaration order, they can be declared as static.
So this commit changes nothing except the order and marking them static.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next
Kalle Valu says:
====================
wireless-drivers-next patches for 5.3
First set of patches for 5.3, but not that many patches this time.
This pull request fails to compile with the tip tree due to
ktime_get_boot_ns() API changes there. It should be easy for Linus to
fix it in p54 driver once he pulls this, an example resolution here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625160432.533aa140@canb.auug.org.au
Major changes:
airo
* switch to use skcipher interface
p54
* support boottime in scan results
rtw88
* add fast xmit support
* add random mac address on scan support
rt2x00
* add software watchdog to detect hangs, it's disabled by default
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Collision of writing rf registers could occur if the driver writes
rf registers by direct write while the hardware is writing other rf
registers by pi write simultaneously.
Hardware pi write can be triggered by rf calibrations sometimes, so
the driver can not always write rf registers by direct write
protection. Direct write protection can make sure that there is no
hardware pi write during the direct write.
According to some experiments, if we add direct write protection
when switching channel, the performance of rf calibration will not
be affected.
Signed-off-by: Chien-Hsun Liao <ben.liao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:851:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_cck_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:852:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ofdm_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:853:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:854:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:855:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:856:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_c2h_cmd_handle_ext' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:50:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_send_h2c_command' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The new rssi_level should be stored in si, otherwise the rssi_level will
never be updated and get a wrong RA mask, which is calculated by the
rssi level
If a wrong RA mask is chosen, the firmware will pick some *bad rates*.
The most hurtful scene will be in *noisy environment*, such as office or
public area with many APs and users.
The latency would be high and the overall throughput would be only half
or less.
Tested in 2.4G in office area, with this patch the throughput increased
from such as "1x Mbps -> 4x Mbps".
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
My compiler complains about:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi’:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:430:26: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
linear = db_invert_table[i][j];
According to comment power_db should be in range 1 ~ 96 .
To fix add check for boundaries before access the array.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_get_channel_group’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:907:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
WARN_ON(1);
^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:908:2: note: here
case 1:
^~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/bcd.h:5,
from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:5:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘phy_get_2g_tx_power_index’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1021:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
WARN_ON(1);
^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1022:2: note: here
case RTW_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
This is a new mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips.
rtw88 now supports RTL8822BE/RTL8822CE now, with basic station mode
functionalities. The firmware for both can be found at linux-firmware.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git
For RTL8822BE: rtw88/rtw8822b_fw.bin
For RTL8822CE: rtw88/rtw8822c_fw.bin
And for now, only PCI buses (RTL8xxxE) are supported. We will add support
for USB and SDIO in the future. The bus interface abstraction can be seen
in this driver such as hci.h. Most of the hardware setting are the same
except for some TRX path or probing setup should be separated.
Supported:
* Basic STA/AP/ADHOC mode, and TDLS (STA is well tested)
Missing feature:
* WOW/PNO
* USB & SDIO bus (such as RTL8xxxU/RTL8xxxS)
* BT coexistence (8822B/8822C are combo ICs)
* Multiple interfaces (for now single STA is better supported)
* Dynamic hardware calibrations (to improve/stabilize performance)
Potential problems:
* static calibration spends too much time, and it is painful for
driver to leave IDLE state. And slows down associate process.
But reload function are under development, will be added soon!
* TRX statictics misleading, as we are not reporting status correctly,
or say, not reporting for "every" packet.
The next patch set should have BT coexistence code since RTL8822B/C are
combo ICs, and the driver for BT can be found after Linux Kernel v4.20.
So it is better to add it first to make WiFi + BT work concurrently.
Although now rtw88 is simple but we are developing more features for it.
Even we want to add support for more chips such as RTL8821C/RTL8814B.
Finally, rtw88 has many authors, listed alphabetically:
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
