summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/scan.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-03-20Merge branches 'pm-qos', 'pm-domains' and 'pm-drivers'Rafael J. Wysocki
* pm-qos: PM / QoS: Add type to dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() arguments ACPI / LPSS: Support for device latency tolerance PM QoS ACPI / scan: Add bind/unbind callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler PM / QoS: Introcuce latency tolerance device PM QoS type PM / QoS: Add no_constraints_value field to struct pm_qos_constraints PM / QoS: Rename device resume latency QoS items * pm-domains: PM / domains: Turn latency warning into debug message * pm-drivers: PM: Add pm_runtime_suspend|resume_force functions PM / runtime: Fetch runtime PM callbacks using a macro
2014-03-17Merge branch 'acpi-ost'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-ost: ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST ACPI: use device name LNXSYBUS.xx for ACPI \_SB and \_TZ objects ACPI / processor: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version ACPI / PAD / xen: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version ACPI / PAD: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version ACPI: rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() to acpi_evaluate_ost()
2014-03-05ACPI / hotplug: Rework deferred execution of acpi_device_hotplug()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2014-02-22ACPI: Drop acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() and ACPI_HOTPLUG_OSTRafael J. Wysocki
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug _OST is supported unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2014-02-22ACPI / ATA: Add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions of SATA devicesRafael J. Wysocki
Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock operations using register_hotplug_dock_device(). That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI dock operations to be dropped in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2014-02-21ACPI / dock: Add .uevent() callback to struct acpi_hotplug_contextRafael J. Wysocki
In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that callback if available. Also rename the existing .event() callback in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible confusion in the future. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-21Merge branch 'acpi-pci-hotplug' into acpi-ostRafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-21ACPI: use device name LNXSYBUS.xx for ACPI \_SB and \_TZ objectsJiang Liu
Use device name "LNXSYBUS:xx" instead of "device.xx" for ACPI objects \_SB and \_TZ. BTW, the original check of "handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT" in statment "else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT)" is always false because of the code at the begin of that block. if (handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) { acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SYSTEM_HID); break; } Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-16ACPI / dock: Pass ACPI device pointer to acpi_device_is_battery()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function. Instead, if acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that happen and modify the function's header accordingly Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-16ACPI / dock: Dispatch dock notifications from the global notify handlerRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of them for handling dock events. However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop the extra namespace scan, so do it. Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb() and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more. Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea, because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway. For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI device objects representing dock stations and the container scan handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-11ACPI / scan: Add bind/unbind callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handlerRafael J. Wysocki
In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup operations on a device object representing a physical device after it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(), respectively. If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there are executed for these purposes. However, an analogous mechanism will be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers. For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify() right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively. To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their .attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the scan handler at hand. This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-06ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug notifications from acpi_bus_notify()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-06ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Simplify acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler() can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-06ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Rework the handling of eject requestsRafael J. Wysocki
To avoid the need to install a hotplug notify handler for each ACPI namespace node representing a device and having a matching scan handler, move the check whether or not the ejection of the given device is enabled through its scan handler from acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(). Also, move the execution of ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS _OST to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(), because in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() or in acpi_eject_store() we really don't know whether or not the eject is going to be in progress (for example, acpi_hotplug_execute() may still fail without queuing up the work item). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-02-06ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Consolidate ACPIPHP with ACPI core hotplugRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing hotplug devices. However, after recent changes causing struct acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more. Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a result of a concurrent table unload). In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn(). For this reason, it's better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler. At the same time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new .hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan handlers. This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device hotplug consolidation possible. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-05ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Define hotplug context lock in the coreRafael J. Wysocki
Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-02-05ACPI / hotplug: Fix potential race in acpi_bus_notify()Rafael J. Wysocki
There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference of that pointer under get_device(). Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device() runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn() queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify(). An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before it subsequent dereference in the "if" block. To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function, acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device() except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex. Then, make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one point. In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() too. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-02-05ACPI / hotplug: Fix panic on eject to ejected deviceToshi Kani
When an eject request is sent to an ejected ACPI device, the following panic occurs: ACPI: \_SB_.SCK3.CPU3: ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST event BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070 IP: [<ffffffff813a7cfe>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x10b/0x33b : Call Trace: [<ffffffff813a24da>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1c/0x27 [<ffffffff8109cbe5>] process_one_work+0x175/0x430 [<ffffffff8109d7db>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0 This is becase device->handler is NULL in acpi_device_hotplug(). This case was used to fail in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as the target had no acpi_deivce. However, acpi_device now exists after ejection. Added a check to verify if acpi_device->handler is valid for an eject request in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(). Note that handler passed from an argument is still valid while acpi_device->handler is NULL. Fixes: 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-29Merge branches 'acpi-processor', 'acpi-hotplug', 'acpi-init', 'acpi-pm' and ↵Rafael J. Wysocki
'acpica' * acpi-processor: ACPI / scan: reduce log level of "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4: failed to get CPU APIC ID" ACPI / processor: Return specific error value when mapping lapic id * acpi-hotplug: ACPI / scan: Clear match_driver flag in acpi_bus_trim() * acpi-init: ACPI / init: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API * acpi-pm: ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() to get ACPI companions of devices * acpica: ACPICA: Remove bool usage from ACPICA.
2014-01-29ACPI / scan: Clear match_driver flag in acpi_bus_trim()Rafael J. Wysocki
Drivers should not bind to struct acpi_device objects that acpi_bus_trim() has been called for, so make that function clear flags.match_driver for those objects. If that is not done, an ACPI driver may theoretically try to operate a device that is not physically present. Fixes: 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2014-01-17Merge branch 'acpi-modules'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-modules: platform: introduce OF style 'modalias' support for platform bus ACPI: fix module autoloading for ACPI enumerated devices ACPI: add module autoloading support for ACPI enumerated devices ACPI: fix create_modalias() return value handling
2014-01-16ACPI: add module autoloading support for ACPI enumerated devicesZhang Rui
An ACPI enumerated device may have its compatible id strings. To support the compatible ACPI ids (acpi_device->pnp.ids), we introduced acpi_driver_match_device() to match the driver->acpi_match_table and acpi_device->pnp.ids. For those drivers, MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xxx) is used to exports the driver module alias in the format of "acpi:device_compatible_ids". But in the mean time, the current code does not export the ACPI compatible strings as part of the module_alias for the ACPI enumerated devices, which will break the module autoloading. Take the following piece of code for example, static const struct acpi_device_id xxx_acpi_match[] = { { "INTABCD", 0 }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xxx_acpi_match); If this piece of code is used in a platform driver for an ACPI enumerated platform device, the platform driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent attribute of its platform device node is "platform:INTABCD:00" (PREFIX:platform_device->name). If this piece of code is used in an i2c driver for an ACPI enumerated i2c device, the i2c driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent of its i2c device node is "i2c:INTABCD:00" (PREFIX:i2c_client->name). If this piece of code is used in an spi driver for an ACPI enumerated spi device, the spi driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent of its spi device node is "spi:INTABCD" (PREFIX:spi_device->modalias). The reason why the module autoloading is not broken for now is that the uevent file of the ACPI device node is "acpi:INTABCD". Thus it is the ACPI device node creation that loads the platform/i2c/spi driver. So this is a problem that will affect us the day when the ACPI bus is removed from device model. This patch introduces two new APIs, one for exporting ACPI ids in uevent MODALIAS field, and another for exporting ACPI ids in device' modalias sysfs attribute. For any bus that supports ACPI enumerated devices, it needs to invoke these two functions for their uevent and modalias attribute. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-16ACPI: fix create_modalias() return value handlingZhang Rui
Currently, create_modalias() handles the output truncated case in an improper way (return -EINVAL). Plus, acpi_device_uevent() and acpi_device_modalias_show() do improper check for the create_modalias() return value as well. This patch fixes create_modalias() to return -EINVAL if there is an output error, return -ENOMEM if the output is truncated, and also fixes both acpi_device_uevent() and acpi_device_modalias_show() to do proper return value check. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-11ACPI / scan: ACPI device object sysfs attribute for _STA evaluationSrinivas Pandruvada
This patch adds a "status" attribute for an ACPI device. This status attribute shows the value of the _STA object. The _STA object returns current status of an ACPI device: enabled, disabled, functioning, present. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> [rjw: Subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-29ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special wayRafael J. Wysocki
ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in the container. However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it notifies user space of the container offline. Moreover, after commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there). Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that will go away during container hot-unplug. The goal of this change is to address both the above issues. The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace scan or on a hotplug event making the container present. That system device will be unregistered on container removal. A new bus type for container devices is added for this purpose, because device offline and online operations need to be defined for them. The online operation is a trivial function that is always successful and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's offline member. For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI device objects right below the container object (its children) and checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline. If that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system devivce cannot be put offline. Consequently, to put the container system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand. Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are initially online. They are created by the container ACPI scan handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set. That causes acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or any devices below it. If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is emitted for the container system device in question and user space is expected to offline all devices below the container and the container itself in response to it. Then, user space can finalize the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device object's eject attribute in sysfs. Tested-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-12-29ACPI / hotplug: Add demand_offline hotplug profile flagRafael J. Wysocki
Add a new ACPI hotplug profile flag, demand_offline, such that if set for the given ACPI device object's scan handler, it will cause acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if that device object's physical companions are offline upfront and fail the hot removal if that is not the case. That flag will be useful to overcome a problem with containers on some system where they can only be hot-removed after some cleanup operations carried out by user space, which needs to be notified of the container hot-removal before the kernel attempts to offline devices in the container. In those cases the current implementation of acpi_scan_hot_remove() is not sufficient, because it first tries to offline the devices in the container and only if that is suffcessful it tries to offline the container itself. As a result, the container hot-removal notification is not delivered to user space at the right time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-07Merge branch 'acpi-cleanup' into acpi-hotplugRafael J. Wysocki
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/scan.c
2013-12-07ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header filesLv Zheng
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-25Merge branches 'acpi-hotplug', 'acpi-sysfs' and 'acpi-sleep'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-hotplug: ACPI / hotplug: Fix conflicted PCI bridge notify handlers * acpi-sysfs: ACPI / sysfs: Fix incorrect ACPI tables walk in acpi_tables_sysfs_init() ACPI / sysfs: Set file size for each exposed ACPI table * acpi-sleep: ACPI / sleep: clean up compiler warning about uninitialized field
2013-11-25ACPI / scan: Use direct recurrence for device hierarchy walksRafael J. Wysocki
Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device object's children directly and call themselves recursively for each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace(). This simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not really necessary for these two routines. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI: Introduce acpi_set_device_status()Rafael J. Wysocki
Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number, acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable. Having done that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Rework generic code to handle suprise removalsRafael J. Wysocki
The generic ACPI hotplug code used for several types of device doesn't handle surprise removals, mostly because those devices currently cannot be removed by surprise in the majority of systems. However, surprise removals should be handled by that code as well as surprise additions of devices, so make it do that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the coreRafael J. Wysocki
Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Make ACPI PCI root hotplug use common hotplug codeRafael J. Wysocki
Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan handler to using the common hotplug code. This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory. Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Introduce common hotplug function acpi_device_hotplug()Rafael J. Wysocki
Modify the common ACPI device hotplug code to always queue up the same function, acpi_device_hotplug(), using acpi_hotplug_execute() and make the PCI host bridge hotplug code use that function too for device hot removal. This allows some code duplication to be reduced and a race condition where the relevant ACPI handle may become invalid between the notification handler and the function queued up by it via acpi_hotplug_execute() to be avoided. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / hotplug: Do not fail bus and device checks for disabled hotplugRafael J. Wysocki
If the scan handler for the given device has hotplug.enabled unset, it doesn't really make sense to fail bus check and device check notifications. First, bus check may not have anything to do with the device it is signaled for, but it may concern another device on the bus below this one. For this reason, bus check notifications should not be failed if hotplug is disabled for the target device. Second, device check notifications are signaled only after a device has already appeared (or disappeared), so failing it can only prevent scan handlers and drivers from attaching to that (already existing) device, which is not very useful. Consequently, if device hotplug is disabled through the device's scan handler, fail eject request notifications only. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespaceRafael J. Wysocki
Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device, processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA. There are multiple reasons to do that. First of all, it avoids quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems). Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may be added to the system. It will also allow user space to evaluate _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing" devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be useful for thermal management on some systems). Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way. Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the deletion of ACPI namespace nodes. Namely, namespace nodes may be deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK. If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that callback may be stale when the callback actually runs. One way to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(), so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22ACPI / scan: Define non-empty device removal handlerRafael J. Wysocki
If an ACPI namespace node is removed (usually, as a result of a table unload), and there is a data object attached to that node, acpi_ns_delete_node() executes the removal handler submitted to acpi_attach_data() for that object. That handler is currently empty for struct acpi_device objects, so it is necessary to detach those objects from the corresponding ACPI namespace nodes in advance every time a table unload may happen. That is cumbersome and inefficient and leads to some design constraints that turn out to be quite inconvenient (in particular, struct acpi_device objects cannot be registered for namespace nodes representing devices that are not reported as present or functional by _STA). For this reason, introduce a non-empty removal handler for ACPI device objects that will unregister them when their ACPI namespace nodes go away. This code modification alone should not change functionality except for the ordering of the ACPI hotplug workqueue which should not matter (without subsequent code changes). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-22Merge back earlier acpi-hotplug material.Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-20ACPI / hotplug: Fix conflicted PCI bridge notify handlersToshi Kani
The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler, handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself. Nevertheless, the ACPI hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges. This causes acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported error as hotplug.enabled is not set. To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by itself. The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common notify handler when this flag is set. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> [rjw: Changed the name of the new flag] Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-19Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-hotplug: ACPI / scan: Set flags.match_driver in acpi_bus_scan_fixed() ACPI / PCI root: Clear driver_data before failing enumeration ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removal ACPI / hotplug: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() return value check
2013-11-19ACPI / scan: Set flags.match_driver in acpi_bus_scan_fixed()Rafael J. Wysocki
Before commit 6931007cc90b (ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers) the match_driver flag for all devices was set in acpi_add_single_object(), but now it is set by acpi_bus_device_attach() which is not called for the "fixed" devices added by acpi_bus_scan_fixed(). This means that flags.match_driver is never set for those devices now, so make acpi_bus_scan_fixed() set it before calling device_attach(). Fixes: 6931007cc90b (ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-19ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removalRafael J. Wysocki
Since the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set hotplug.enabled, the check of it in acpi_bus_device_eject() effectively prevents the root bridge hot removal from working after commit a3b1b1ef78cd (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines). However, that check is not necessary, because the other acpi_bus_device_eject() users, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb and acpi_eject_store(), do the same check by themselves before executing that function. For this reason, remove the scan handler check from acpi_bus_device_eject() to make PCI hot bridge hot removal work again. Fixes: a3b1b1ef78cd (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-19ACPI / hotplug: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() return value checkRafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_bus_get_device() returns a plain int and not acpi_status, ACPI_FAILURE() should not be used for checking its return value. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07Merge branch 'acpi-hotplug'Rafael J. Wysocki
* acpi-hotplug: ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines ACPI / hotplug: Do not execute "insert in progress" _OST ACPI / hotplug: Carry out PCI root eject directly ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines ACPI / hotplug: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() internal ACPI / hotplug: Simplify device ejection routines ACPI / hotplug: Fix handle_root_bridge_removal() ACPI / hotplug: Refuse to hot-remove all objects with disabled hotplug ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers ACPI: Remove acpi_pci_slot_init() headers from internal.h Conflicts: include/acpi/acpiosxf.h (with the 'acpica' branch)
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routinesRafael J. Wysocki
There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common ACPI hotplug code and docking stations. They both are somewhat cumbersome to use and work slightly differently. The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work function with one more argument and let the interface take care of the execution details. The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute(). Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute() uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute(). Also, acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar. That leads to somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up. For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface, acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more friendly to its users than any of the two. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Do not execute "insert in progress" _OSTRafael J. Wysocki
According to the ACPI spec (5.0, Section 6.3.5), the "Device insertion in progress (pending)" (0x80) _OST status code is reserved for the "Insertion Processing" (0x200) source event which is "a result of an OSPM action". Specifically, it is not a notification, so that status code should not be used during notification processing, which unfortunately is done by acpi_scan_bus_device_check(). For this reason, drop the ACPI_OST_SC_INSERT_IN_PROGRESS _OST status evaluation from there (it was a mistake to put it in there in the first place). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Carry out PCI root eject directlyRafael J. Wysocki
Since _handle_hotplug_event_root() is run from the ACPI hotplug workqueue, it doesn't need to queue up a work item to eject a PCI host bridge on the same workqueue. Instead, it can just carry out the eject by calling acpi_bus_device_eject() directly, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routinesRafael J. Wysocki
There is no real reasn why acpi_bus_device_eject() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() should work differently, so rework acpi_bus_device_eject() so that it can be called internally by both acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and acpi_eject_store_work(). Accordingly, rework acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to queue up the execution of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() through acpi_os_hotplug_execute() on eject request notifications. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-11-07ACPI / hotplug: Make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() internalRafael J. Wysocki
Notice that handle_root_bridge_removal() is the only user of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so it doesn't have to be exported any more and can be made internal to the ACPI core. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>