Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Found problem on system that firmware that could handle pci aer.
Firmware get error reporting after pci injecting error, before os boots.
But after os boots, firmware can not get report anymore, even pci=noaer
is passed.
Root cause: BIOS _OSC has problem with query bit checking.
It turns out that BIOS vendor is copying example code from ACPI Spec.
In ACPI Spec 5.0, page 290:
If (Not(And(CDW1,1))) // Query flag clear?
{ // Disable GPEs for features granted native control.
If (And(CTRL,0x01)) // Hot plug control granted?
{
Store(0,HPCE) // clear the hot plug SCI enable bit
Store(1,HPCS) // clear the hot plug SCI status bit
}
...
}
When Query flag is set, And(CDW1,1) will be 1, Not(1) will return 0xfffffffe.
So it will get into code path that should be for control set only.
BIOS acpi code should be changed to "If (LEqual(And(CDW1,1), 0)))"
Current kernel code is using _OSC query to notify firmware about support
from OS and then use _OSC to set control bits.
During query support, current code is using all possible controls.
So will execute code that should be only for control set stage.
That will have problem when pci=noaer or aer firmware_first is used.
As firmware have that control set for os aer already in query support stage,
but later will not os aer handling.
We should avoid passing all possible controls, just use osc_control_set
instead.
That should workaround BIOS bugs with affected systems on the field
as more bios vendors are copying sample code from ACPI spec.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
During merging the PCI tree with the PM/ACPI tree, Linus noticed
that we don't use the same lock using patten about ACPI PCI root as
acpiphp.
Here apply the same locking patten, and we need to execute
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() via acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
as it also holds acpi_scan_lock.
[rjw: Changelog]
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
No-objection-from: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci
Pull PCI changes from Bjorn Helgaas:
"Host bridge hotplug
- Major overhaul of ACPI host bridge add/start (Rafael Wysocki, Yinghai Lu)
- Major overhaul of PCI/ACPI binding (Rafael Wysocki, Yinghai Lu)
- Split out ACPI host bridge and ACPI PCI device hotplug (Yinghai Lu)
- Stop caching _PRT and make independent of bus numbers (Yinghai Lu)
PCI device hotplug
- Clean up cpqphp dead code (Sasha Levin)
- Disable ARI unless device and upstream bridge support it (Yijing Wang)
- Initialize all hot-added devices (not functions 0-7) (Yijing Wang)
Power management
- Don't touch ASPM if disabled (Joe Lawrence)
- Fix ASPM link state management (Myron Stowe)
Miscellaneous
- Fix PCI_EXP_FLAGS accessor (Alex Williamson)
- Disable Bus Master in pci_device_shutdown (Konstantin Khlebnikov)
- Document hotplug resource and MPS parameters (Yijing Wang)
- Add accessor for PCIe capabilities (Myron Stowe)
- Drop pciehp suspend/resume messages (Paul Bolle)
- Make pci_slot built-in only (not a module) (Jiang Liu)
- Remove unused PCI/ACPI bind ops (Jiang Liu)
- Removed used pci_root_bus (Bjorn Helgaas)"
* tag 'pci-v3.9-changes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci: (51 commits)
PCI/ACPI: Don't cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers
PCI: Fix PCI Express Capability accessors for PCI_EXP_FLAGS
ACPI / PCI: Make pci_slot built-in only, not a module
PCI/PM: Clear state_saved during suspend
PCI: Use atomic_inc_return() rather than atomic_add_return()
PCI: Catch attempts to disable already-disabled devices
PCI: Disable Bus Master unconditionally in pci_device_shutdown()
PCI: acpiphp: Remove dead code for PCI host bridge hotplug
PCI: acpiphp: Create companion ACPI devices before creating PCI devices
PCI: Remove unused "rc" in virtfn_add_bus()
PCI: pciehp: Drop suspend/resume ENTRY messages
PCI/ASPM: Don't touch ASPM if forcibly disabled
PCI/ASPM: Deallocate upstream link state even if device is not PCIe
PCI: Document MPS parameters pci=pcie_bus_safe, pci=pcie_bus_perf, etc
PCI: Document hpiosize= and hpmemsize= resource reservation parameters
PCI: Use PCI Express Capability accessor
PCI: Introduce accessor to retrieve PCIe Capabilities Register
PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible
PCI: Skip attaching driver in device_add()
PCI: acpiphp: Keep driver loaded even if no slots found
...
|
|
* pci/yinghai-root-bus-hotplug:
PCI/ACPI: Don't cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers
|
|
Previously, we cached _PRT (PCI routing table, ACPI 5.0 sec 6.2.12)
contents and associated each _PRT entry with a PCI bus number. The bus
number association means dependencies on PCI device enumeration and bus
number assignment, as well as on the PCI/ACPI binding process.
After 4f535093cf ("PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible"),
these dependencies caused the IRQ issues reported by Peter:
pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 09] (subtractive decode)
pci 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
snd_ctxfi 0000:09:02.0: PCI INT A: no GSI - using ISA IRQ 5
irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
This patch removes _PRT caching. Instead, we evaluate _PRT as needed
in the pci_enable_device() path. This also removes the dependency on
PCI bus numbers: we can simply look at the _PRT associated with each
bridge as we walk upstream toward the root.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53561
Reported-and-tested-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
Make the ACPI PCI root bridge driver use struct acpi_scan_handler
for representing the object used to enumerate the PCI busses under
PCI host bridges found in the ACPI namespace (and to tear down data
structures representing the bus and devices on it before
unregistering the host bridges' ACPI device nodes).
This simplifies the code slightly and reduces the kernel's memory
footprint by avoiding the registration of a struct device_driver
object with the driver core and creation of its sysfs directory
which is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
|
|
* pci/yinghai-root-bus-hotplug:
PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible
PCI: Skip attaching driver in device_add()
PCI: acpiphp: Keep driver loaded even if no slots found
PCI/ACPI: Print info if host bridge notify handler installation fails
PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug to pci_root.c
PCI/ACPI: acpiphp: Rename alloc_acpiphp_hp_work() to alloc_acpi_hp_work()
PCI: Make device create/destroy logic symmetric
PCI: Fix reference count leak in pci_dev_present()
PCI: Set pci_dev dev_node early so IOAPIC irq_descs are allocated locally
PCI: Add root bus children dev's res to fail list
PCI: acpiphp: Add is_hotplug_bridge detection
Conflicts:
drivers/pci/pci.h
|
|
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used
by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver
through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device
object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver
.remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
|
|
acpi_install_notify_handler() could fail. So check the exit status
and give a better debug info.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The acpiphp driver is confusing because it contains partial support for PCI
host bridge hotplug as well as support for hotplug of PCI devices.
This patch moves the host bridge hot-add support to pci_root.c and adds
hot-remove support in pci_root.c.
How to test it: if sci_emu patch is applied, find out root bus number to
ACPI root name mapping from dmesg or /sys. To remove root bus:
echo "\_SB.PCIB 3" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify
To add back root bus:
echo "\_SB.PCIB 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
"firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
(to put it lightly).
This is how it works, roughly:
1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
object to acpi_pci_root_add().
2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
populates its "device" field with its argument's address
(device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
passed to pci_create_root_bus().
4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
So far, so good. Now it starts to be "interesting".
6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
given device object.
7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
and bus numbers. Its handle is then used to initialize the
ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
acpi_bind_one(). However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
started with in step 1.
Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
thanks to commit f3fd0c8 (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
passed to device_register(). Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
aren't necessary any more.
Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm into pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan
* 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member
ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c
ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup
ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add()
ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different
ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion
ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
|
|
Firmware may have assigned PCI BARs for hot-added devices, so reserve
those resources before trying to allocate more.
[bhelgaas: move empty weak definition here]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power
resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup()
and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more. Accordingly,
remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations
from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
|
|
Move the code from the ACPI PCI root bridge's .start() callback
routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), directly into acpi_pci_root_add()
and drop acpi_pci_root_start().
It is safe to do that, because it is now always guaranteed that
when struct pci_dev objects are created, their companion struct
acpi_device objects are already present, so it is not necessary to
wait for them to be created before calling pci_bus_add_devices().
This change was previously proposed in a different form by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
|
|
Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys
initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the
ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge
driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run
before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects
to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in
the ACPI namespace.
The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the
situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug,
in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present.
The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev
objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and
these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other
ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope. For example, devices
created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be
added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges. For this
purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those
bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are
registered.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
|
|
Pull PCI update from Bjorn Helgaas:
"Host bridge hotplug:
- Untangle _PRT from struct pci_bus (Bjorn Helgaas)
- Request _OSC control before scanning root bus (Taku Izumi)
- Assign resources when adding host bridge (Yinghai Lu)
- Remove root bus when removing host bridge (Yinghai Lu)
- Remove _PRT during hot remove (Yinghai Lu)
SRIOV
- Add sysfs knobs to control numVFs (Don Dutile)
Power management
- Notify devices when power resource turned on (Huang Ying)
Bug fixes
- Work around broken _SEG on HP xw9300 (Bjorn Helgaas)
- Keep runtime PM enabled for unbound PCI devices (Huang Ying)
- Fix Optimus dual-GPU runtime D3 suspend issue (Dave Airlie)
- Fix xen frontend shutdown issue (David Vrabel)
- Work around PLX PCI 9050 BAR alignment erratum (Ian Abbott)
Miscellaneous
- Add GPL license for drivers/pci/ioapic (Andrew Cooks)
- Add standard PCI-X, PCIe ASPM register #defines (Bjorn Helgaas)
- NumaChip remote PCI support (Daniel Blueman)
- Fix PCIe Link Capabilities Supported Link Speed definition (Jingoo
Han)
- Convert dev_printk() to dev_info(), etc (Joe Perches)
- Add support for non PCI BAR ROM data (Matthew Garrett)
- Add x86 support for host bridge translation offset (Mike Yoknis)
- Report success only when every driver supports AER (Vijay
Pandarathil)"
Fix up trivial conflicts.
* tag 'for-3.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci: (48 commits)
PCI: Use phys_addr_t for physical ROM address
x86/PCI: Add NumaChip remote PCI support
ath9k: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields
iwlwifi: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields
iwlwifi: collapse wrapper for pcie_capability_read_word()
iwlegacy: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields
iwlegacy: collapse wrapper for pcie_capability_read_word()
cxgb3: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields
PCI: Add standard PCIe Capability Link ASPM field names
PCI/portdrv: Use PCI Express Capability accessors
PCI: Use standard PCIe Capability Link register field names
x86: Use PCI setup data
PCI: Add support for non-BAR ROMs
PCI: Add pcibios_add_device
EFI: Stash ROMs if they're not in the PCI BAR
PCI: Add and use standard PCI-X Capability register names
PCI/PM: Keep runtime PM enabled for unbound PCI devices
xen-pcifront: Handle backend CLOSED without CLOSING
PCI: SRIOV control and status via sysfs (documentation)
PCI/AER: Report success only when every device has AER-aware driver
...
|
|
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This patch moves up the code block to request _OSC control in order to
separate ACPI work and PCI work in acpi_pci_root_add().
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
pci_ext_cfg_avail() doesn't use the "struct pci_dev *" passed to
it, and there's no requirement that a host bridge even be represented
by a pci_dev. This drops the pci_ext_cfg_avail() parameter.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
We used to add the _PRT after enumerating devices behind a new host
bridge. This moves the _PRT addition *before* the enumeration, since
it no longer depends on the struct pci_bus existing. This is one
step towards consolidating the .add/.start methods.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumim.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
|
|
This effectively reverts 859a3f86ca8 ("ACPI: simplify
acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() API") and d9efae3688a ("ACPI: simplify
acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() API").
The reason is to disentangle these routines from the struct pci_bus.
We want to be able to add the _PRT before the struct pci_bus
exists, and delete the _PRT after we've removed the pci_bus.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
|
|
Call the sub-driver .remove() methods in the reverse order of the
.add() methods for symmetry.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Corresponding to add path.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
It will call pci_stop_and_remove_bus() to stop/remove pci root bus.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
|
|
After we get hot-added IOAPIC registered.
pci_enable_bridges() will try to enable IOAPIC IRQ for PCI bridges.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
This patch changes the implementation of acpi_pci_find_root().
We can access acpi_pci_root without scanning acpi_pci_roots list.
If hostbridge hotplug is supported, acpi_pci_roots list will be
protected by mutex. We should not access acpi_pci_roots list
if preventable to lessen deadlock risk.
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
Use mutex to protect acpi_pci_roots list against PCI host bridge
hotplug operations.
[bhelgaas: s/struct acpi_handle *handle/acpi_handle handle/]
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
This patch changes .add/.remove interfaces of acpi_pci_driver.
In the current implementation acpi_handle is passed as a parameter
of .add/.remove interface. However, the acpi_pci_root structure
contains more useful information than just the acpi_handle. This
enables us to avoid some useless lookups in each acpi_pci_driver.
Note: This changes interfaces used by acpi_pci_register_driver(), an
exported symbol. This patch updates all the in-kernel users, but any
out-of-kernel acpi_pci_register_driver() users will need updates.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
Use mutex to protect global acpi_pci_drivers list against PCI
host bridge hotplug operations.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
When hot-plugging PCI root bridge, acpi_pci_drivers' add()/remove()
methods should be invoked to notify registered drivers.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
Use normal list for struct acpi_pci_driver to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
'osc-pcie' into base
|
|
If acpi_pci_osc_support() fails for the given flags, it doesn't make
sense to call acpi_pci_osc_control_set() down the road for the same
flags, because it will certainly fail too. Moreover, problem
diagnostics is then harder, because it is not too easy to identify
the reason of the _OSC failure in those cases.
For this reason, check the status returned by acpi_pci_osc_support()
for PCIe support flags and do not attempt to execute
acpi_pci_osc_control_set() for those flags and print a message if
it's "failure". For compatibility with the existing code, disable
ASPM in that case too.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
This patch provide MMCONFIG address for PCI host bridges, which will
be used to support host bridge hotplug. It gets MMCONFIG address
by evaluating _CBA method if available.
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
|
|
Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates
that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation
"PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think
that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform
grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features -
including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless
the platform has granted us that control.
This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing
of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS.
The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the
ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been
disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where
only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the
BIOS state.
It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do -
there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these
components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this
bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone.
Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
Trivial fix for 80 char line overflow in drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
If an attempt to get _OSC control of the PCIe native features from the
BIOS fails, report the resulting mask of control flags the BIOS was
willing to grant in the error message. Moreover, if the _OSC support
mask is insufficient for requesting control of the PCIe native features
or pcie_ports_disabled is set, print a diagnostic message containing the
_OSC support mask. This helps to diagnose obscure _OSC-related problems
on a number machines.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
v3 -> v2: Added text to describe the problem
v2 -> v1: Split this patch from v1
v1 : Part of: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130042212003242&w=2
Disable ASPM when no _OSC control for PCIe services is granted
by the BIOS. This is to protect systems with a buggy BIOS that
did not set the ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit even though the
underlying HW can't do ASPM.
To turn "on" ASPM the minimum the BIOS needs to do:
1. Clear the ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit.
2. Support _OSC appropriately
There is no _OSC Control bit for ASPM. However, we expect the BIOS to
support _OSC for a Root Bridge that originates a PCIe hierarchy. If this
is not the case - we are better off not enabling ASPM on that server.
Commit 852972acff8f10f3a15679be2059bb94916cba5d (ACPI: Disable ASPM if the
Platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) describes the above scenario.
To quote verbatim from there:
[The PCI SIG documentation for the _OSC OS/firmware handshaking interface
states:
"If the _OSC control method is absent from the scope of a host bridge
device, then the operating system must not enable or attempt to use any
features defined in this section for the hierarchy originated by the host
bridge."
The obvious interpretation of this is that the OS should not attempt to use
PCIe hotplug, PME or AER - however, the specification also notes that an
_OSC method is *required* for PCIe hierarchies, and experimental validation
with An Alternative OS indicates that it doesn't use any PCIe functionality
if the _OSC method is missing. That arguably means we shouldn't be using
MSI or extended config space, but right now our problems seem to be limited
to vendors being surprised when ASPM gets enabled on machines when other
OSs refuse to do so. So, for now, let's just disable ASPM if the _OSC
method doesn't exist or refuses to hand over PCIe capability control.]
Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
We need to distinguish the situation in which ASPM support is
disabled from the command line or through .config from the situation
in which it is disabled, because the hardware or BIOS can't handle
it. In the former case we should not report ASPM support to the BIOS
through ACPI _OSC, but in the latter case we should do that.
Introduce pcie_aspm_support_enabled() that can be used by
acpi_pci_root_add() to determine whether or not it should report ASPM
support to the BIOS through _OSC.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29722
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232
Reported-and-tested-by: Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch>
Reviewed-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
Commit 415e12b23792 ("PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control once for each root
bridge (v3)") put the acpi_hest_init() call in acpi_pci_root_init() into
a wrong place, presumably because the author confused acpi_pci_disabled
with acpi_disabled. Bring the code ordering in acpi_pci_root_init()
back to sanity.
Additionally, make sure that hest_disable is set when acpi_disabled is
set, which is going to prevent acpi_hest_parse(), that still may be
executed for acpi_disabled=1 through aer_acpi_firmware_first(), from
crashing because of uninitialized hest_tab.
Reported-and-tested-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Move the evaluation of acpi_pci_osc_control_set() (to request control of
PCI Express native features) into acpi_pci_root_add() to avoid calling
it many times for the same root complex with the same arguments.
Additionally, check if all of the requisite _OSC support bits are set
before calling acpi_pci_osc_control_set() for a given root complex.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232
Reported-by: Ozan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Tested-by: Ozan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
Remove unused declaration of proc_fs.h.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
After commit 852972acff8f10f3a15679be2059bb94916cba5d (ACPI: Disable
ASPM if the platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) control of
the PCIe Capability Structure is unconditionally requested by
acpi_pci_root_add(), which in principle may cause problems to
happen in two ways. First, the BIOS may refuse to give control of
the PCIe Capability Structure if it is not asked for any of the
_OSC features depending on it at the same time. Second, the BIOS may
assume that control of the _OSC features depending on the PCIe
Capability Structure will be requested in the future and may behave
incorrectly if that doesn't happen. For this reason, control of
the PCIe Capability Structure should always be requested along with
control of any other _OSC features that may depend on it (ie. PCIe
native PME, PCIe native hot-plug, PCIe AER).
Rework the PCIe port driver so that (1) it checks which native PCIe
port services can be enabled, according to the BIOS, and (2) it
requests control of all these services simultaneously. In
particular, this causes pcie_portdrv_probe() to fail if the BIOS
refuses to grant control of the PCIe Capability Structure, which
means that no native PCIe port services can be enabled for the PCIe
Root Complex the given port belongs to. If that happens, ASPM is
disabled to avoid problems with mishandling it by the part of the
PCIe hierarchy for which control of the PCIe Capability Structure
has not been received.
Make it possible to override this behavior using 'pcie_ports=native'
(use the PCIe native services regardless of the BIOS response to the
control request), or 'pcie_ports=compat' (do not use the PCIe native
services at all).
Accordingly, rework the existing PCIe port service drivers so that
they don't request control of the services directly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
It is possible that the BIOS will not grant control of all _OSC
features requested via acpi_pci_osc_control_set(), so it is
recommended to negotiate the final set of _OSC features with the
query flag set before calling _OSC to request control of these
features.
To implement it, rework acpi_pci_osc_control_set() so that the caller
can specify the mask of _OSC control bits to negotiate and the mask
of _OSC control bits that are absolutely necessary to it. Then,
acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will run _OSC queries in a loop until
the mask of _OSC control bits returned by the BIOS is equal to the
mask passed to it. Also, before running the _OSC request
acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will check if the caller's required
control bits are present in the final mask.
Using this mechanism we will be able to avoid situations in which the
BIOS doesn't grant control of certain _OSC features, because they
depend on some other _OSC features that have not been requested.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
There is the assumption in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() that it is
always sufficient to compare the mask of _OSC control bits to be
requested with the result of an _OSC query where all of the known
control bits have been checked. However, in general, that need not
be the case. For example, if an _OSC feature A depends on an _OSC
feature B and control of A, B plus another _OSC feature C is
requested simultaneously, the BIOS may return A, B, C, while it would
only return C if A and C were requested without B.
That may result in passing a wrong mask of _OSC control bits to an
_OSC control request, in which case the BIOS may only grant control
of a subset of the requested features. Moreover, acpi_pci_run_osc()
will return error code if that happens and the caller of
acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will not know that it's been granted
control of some _OSC features. Consequently, the system will
generally not work as expected.
Apart from this acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always uses the mask
of _OSC control bits returned by the very first invocation of
acpi_pci_query_osc(), but that is done with the second argument
equal to OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT which generally happens
to affect the returned _OSC control bits.
For these reasons, make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always check if
control of the requested _OSC features will be granted before making
the final control request. As a result, the osc_control_qry and
osc_queried members of struct acpi_pci_root are not necessary any
more, so drop them and remove the remaining code referring to them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
Make acpi_pci_query_osc() use an additional pointer argument to
return the mask of control bits obtained from the BIOS to the
caller.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
Make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() attempt to find the handle of the
_OSC object under the given PCI root bridge object after verifying
that its second argument is correct and that there is a struct
acpi_pci_root object for the given root bridge handle, which is
more logical than the old code.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|
|
The PCI SIG documentation for the _OSC OS/firmware handshaking interface
states:
"If the _OSC control method is absent from the scope of a host bridge
device, then the operating system must not enable or attempt to use any
features defined in this section for the hierarchy originated by the host
bridge."
The obvious interpretation of this is that the OS should not attempt to use
PCIe hotplug, PME or AER - however, the specification also notes that an
_OSC method is *required* for PCIe hierarchies, and experimental validation
with An Alternative OS indicates that it doesn't use any PCIe functionality
if the _OSC method is missing. That arguably means we shouldn't be using
MSI or extended config space, but right now our problems seem to be limited
to vendors being surprised when ASPM gets enabled on machines when other
OSs refuse to do so. So, for now, let's just disable ASPM if the _OSC
method doesn't exist or refuses to hand over PCIe capability control.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
|