summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/hugetlb.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>2020-08-11 18:30:32 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-08-12 10:57:55 -0700
commit8ca39e6874f812a393bb66d9fdbb7598d5f0451c (patch)
tree2bf84c48a229894833fecfaba7c832ff20fcde09 /mm/hugetlb.c
parent90631e1dea55bfc14a8ee8c594aa136b243d4c88 (diff)
mm/hugetlb: add mempolicy check in the reservation routine
In the reservation routine, we only check whether the cpuset meets the memory allocation requirements. But we ignore the mempolicy of MPOL_BIND case. If someone mmap hugetlb succeeds, but the subsequent memory allocation may fail due to mempolicy restrictions and receives the SIGBUS signal. This can be reproduced by the follow steps. 1) Compile the test case. cd tools/testing/selftests/vm/ gcc map_hugetlb.c -o map_hugetlb 2) Pre-allocate huge pages. Suppose there are 2 numa nodes in the system. Each node will pre-allocate one huge page. echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages 3) Run test case(mmap 4MB). We receive the SIGBUS signal. numactl --membind=3D0 ./map_hugetlb 4 With this patch applied, the mmap will fail in the step 3) and throw "mmap: Cannot allocate memory". [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include sched.h for `current'] Reported-by: Jianchao Guo <guojianchao@bytedance.com> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200728034938.14993-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/hugetlb.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/hugetlb.c22
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index e52c878940bb..dffafb5bf2ed 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3458,13 +3458,21 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
}
__setup("default_hugepagesz=", default_hugepagesz_setup);
-static unsigned int cpuset_mems_nr(unsigned int *array)
+static unsigned int allowed_mems_nr(struct hstate *h)
{
int node;
unsigned int nr = 0;
+ nodemask_t *mpol_allowed;
+ unsigned int *array = h->free_huge_pages_node;
+ gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
+
+ mpol_allowed = policy_nodemask_current(gfp_mask);
- for_each_node_mask(node, cpuset_current_mems_allowed)
- nr += array[node];
+ for_each_node_mask(node, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
+ if (!mpol_allowed ||
+ (mpol_allowed && node_isset(node, *mpol_allowed)))
+ nr += array[node];
+ }
return nr;
}
@@ -3643,12 +3651,18 @@ static int hugetlb_acct_memory(struct hstate *h, long delta)
* we fall back to check against current free page availability as
* a best attempt and hopefully to minimize the impact of changing
* semantics that cpuset has.
+ *
+ * Apart from cpuset, we also have memory policy mechanism that
+ * also determines from which node the kernel will allocate memory
+ * in a NUMA system. So similar to cpuset, we also should consider
+ * the memory policy of the current task. Similar to the description
+ * above.
*/
if (delta > 0) {
if (gather_surplus_pages(h, delta) < 0)
goto out;
- if (delta > cpuset_mems_nr(h->free_huge_pages_node)) {
+ if (delta > allowed_mems_nr(h)) {
return_unused_surplus_pages(h, delta);
goto out;
}