diff options
author | James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com> | 2019-11-04 16:57:05 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> | 2019-11-06 00:04:04 -0500 |
commit | 93a4d6f40198dffcca35d9a928c409f9290f1fe0 (patch) | |
tree | 9fe67396e64594161ac4736055e3ab75ea72acbe /drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | |
parent | b9da814cd5f5bb93041a6e4dbc9c5149713186ff (diff) |
scsi: lpfc: Add registration for CPU Offline/Online events
The recent affinitization didn't address cpu offlining/onlining. If an
interrupt vector is shared and the low order cpu owning the vector is
offlined, as interrupts are managed, the vector is taken offline. This
causes the other CPUs sharing the vector will hang as they can't get io
completions.
Correct by registering callbacks with the system for Offline/Online
events. When a cpu is taken offline, its eq, which is tied to an interrupt
vector is found. If the cpu is the "owner" of the vector and if the
eq/vector is shared by other CPUs, the eq is placed into a polled mode.
Additionally, code paths that perform io submission on the "sharing CPUs"
will check the eq state and poll for completion after submission of new io
to a wq that uses the eq.
Similarly, when a cpu comes back online and owns an offlined vector, the eq
is taken out of polled mode and rearmed to start driving interrupts for eq.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105005708.7399-9-jsmart2021@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 164 |
1 files changed, 159 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c index 660f96218b25..f8de313d592c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_eqcq_flush(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *eq) } static int -lpfc_sli4_process_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *eq) +lpfc_sli4_process_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *eq, + uint8_t rearm) { struct lpfc_eqe *eqe; int count = 0, consumed = 0; @@ -549,8 +550,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_process_eq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *eq) eq->queue_claimed = 0; rearm_and_exit: - /* Always clear and re-arm the EQ */ - phba->sli4_hba.sli4_write_eq_db(phba, eq, consumed, LPFC_QUEUE_REARM); + /* Always clear the EQ. */ + phba->sli4_hba.sli4_write_eq_db(phba, eq, consumed, rearm); return count; } @@ -7948,7 +7949,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_process_missed_mbox_completions(struct lpfc_hba *phba) if (mbox_pending) /* process and rearm the EQ */ - lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, fpeq); + lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, fpeq, LPFC_QUEUE_REARM); else /* Always clear and re-arm the EQ */ sli4_hba->sli4_write_eq_db(phba, fpeq, 0, LPFC_QUEUE_REARM); @@ -10113,10 +10114,13 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t ring_number, struct lpfc_iocbq *piocb, uint32_t flag) { struct lpfc_sli_ring *pring; + struct lpfc_queue *eq; unsigned long iflags; int rc; if (phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4) { + eq = phba->sli4_hba.hdwq[piocb->hba_wqidx].hba_eq; + pring = lpfc_sli4_calc_ring(phba, piocb); if (unlikely(pring == NULL)) return IOCB_ERROR; @@ -10124,6 +10128,8 @@ lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t ring_number, spin_lock_irqsave(&pring->ring_lock, iflags); rc = __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, ring_number, piocb, flag); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags); + + lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH); } else { /* For now, SLI2/3 will still use hbalock */ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags); @@ -14302,7 +14308,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_hba_intr_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) lpfc_sli4_mod_hba_eq_delay(phba, fpeq, LPFC_MAX_AUTO_EQ_DELAY); /* process and rearm the EQ */ - ecount = lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, fpeq); + ecount = lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, fpeq, LPFC_QUEUE_REARM); if (unlikely(ecount == 0)) { fpeq->EQ_no_entry++; @@ -14362,6 +14368,147 @@ lpfc_sli4_intr_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) return (hba_handled == true) ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; } /* lpfc_sli4_intr_handler */ +void lpfc_sli4_poll_hbtimer(struct timer_list *t) +{ + struct lpfc_hba *phba = from_timer(phba, t, cpuhp_poll_timer); + struct lpfc_queue *eq; + int i = 0; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + list_for_each_entry_rcu(eq, &phba->poll_list, _poll_list) + i += lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(eq, LPFC_POLL_SLOWPATH); + if (!list_empty(&phba->poll_list)) + mod_timer(&phba->cpuhp_poll_timer, + jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(LPFC_POLL_HB)); + + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + +inline int lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(struct lpfc_queue *eq, uint8_t path) +{ + struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba; + int i = 0; + + /* + * Unlocking an irq is one of the entry point to check + * for re-schedule, but we are good for io submission + * path as midlayer does a get_cpu to glue us in. Flush + * out the invalidate queue so we can see the updated + * value for flag. + */ + smp_rmb(); + + if (READ_ONCE(eq->mode) == LPFC_EQ_POLL) + /* We will not likely get the completion for the caller + * during this iteration but i guess that's fine. + * Future io's coming on this eq should be able to + * pick it up. As for the case of single io's, they + * will be handled through a sched from polling timer + * function which is currently triggered every 1msec. + */ + i = lpfc_sli4_process_eq(phba, eq, LPFC_QUEUE_NOARM); + + return i; +} + +static inline void lpfc_sli4_add_to_poll_list(struct lpfc_queue *eq) +{ + struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba; + + if (list_empty(&phba->poll_list)) { + timer_setup(&phba->cpuhp_poll_timer, lpfc_sli4_poll_hbtimer, 0); + /* kickstart slowpath processing for this eq */ + mod_timer(&phba->cpuhp_poll_timer, + jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(LPFC_POLL_HB)); + } + + list_add_rcu(&eq->_poll_list, &phba->poll_list); + synchronize_rcu(); +} + +static inline void lpfc_sli4_remove_from_poll_list(struct lpfc_queue *eq) +{ + struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba; + + /* Disable slowpath processing for this eq. Kick start the eq + * by RE-ARMING the eq's ASAP + */ + list_del_rcu(&eq->_poll_list); + synchronize_rcu(); + + if (list_empty(&phba->poll_list)) + del_timer_sync(&phba->cpuhp_poll_timer); +} + +inline void lpfc_sli4_cleanup_poll_list(struct lpfc_hba *phba) +{ + struct lpfc_queue *eq, *next; + + list_for_each_entry_safe(eq, next, &phba->poll_list, _poll_list) + list_del(&eq->_poll_list); + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->poll_list); + synchronize_rcu(); +} + +static inline void +__lpfc_sli4_switch_eqmode(struct lpfc_queue *eq, uint8_t mode) +{ + if (mode == eq->mode) + return; + /* + * currently this function is only called during a hotplug + * event and the cpu on which this function is executing + * is going offline. By now the hotplug has instructed + * the scheduler to remove this cpu from cpu active mask. + * So we don't need to work about being put aside by the + * scheduler for a high priority process. Yes, the inte- + * rrupts could come but they are known to retire ASAP. + */ + + /* Disable polling in the fastpath */ + WRITE_ONCE(eq->mode, mode); + /* flush out the store buffer */ + smp_wmb(); + + /* + * Add this eq to the polling list and start polling. For + * a grace period both interrupt handler and poller will + * try to process the eq _but_ that's fine. We have a + * synchronization mechanism in place (queue_claimed) to + * deal with it. This is just a draining phase for int- + * errupt handler (not eq's) as we have guranteed through + * barrier that all the CPUs have seen the new CQ_POLLED + * state. which will effectively disable the REARMING of + * the EQ. The whole idea is eq's die off eventually as + * we are not rearming EQ's anymore. + */ + mode ? lpfc_sli4_add_to_poll_list(eq) : + lpfc_sli4_remove_from_poll_list(eq); +} + +void lpfc_sli4_start_polling(struct lpfc_queue *eq) +{ + __lpfc_sli4_switch_eqmode(eq, LPFC_EQ_POLL); +} + +void lpfc_sli4_stop_polling(struct lpfc_queue *eq) +{ + struct lpfc_hba *phba = eq->phba; + + __lpfc_sli4_switch_eqmode(eq, LPFC_EQ_INTERRUPT); + + /* Kick start for the pending io's in h/w. + * Once we switch back to interrupt processing on a eq + * the io path completion will only arm eq's when it + * receives a completion. But since eq's are in disa- + * rmed state it doesn't receive a completion. This + * creates a deadlock scenaro. + */ + phba->sli4_hba.sli4_write_eq_db(phba, eq, 0, LPFC_QUEUE_REARM); +} + /** * lpfc_sli4_queue_free - free a queue structure and associated memory * @queue: The queue structure to free. @@ -14436,6 +14583,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_queue_alloc(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t page_size, return NULL; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->_poll_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->wq_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->wqfull_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->page_list); @@ -19757,6 +19905,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_issue_wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli4_hdw_queue *qp, lpfc_sli_ringtxcmpl_put(phba, pring, pwqe); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags); + + lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH); return 0; } @@ -19777,6 +19927,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_issue_wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli4_hdw_queue *qp, } lpfc_sli_ringtxcmpl_put(phba, pring, pwqe); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags); + + lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH); return 0; } @@ -19805,6 +19957,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_issue_wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_sli4_hdw_queue *qp, } lpfc_sli_ringtxcmpl_put(phba, pring, pwqe); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pring->ring_lock, iflags); + + lpfc_sli4_poll_eq(qp->hba_eq, LPFC_POLL_FASTPATH); return 0; } return WQE_ERROR; |