Merge tag 'sizeof_field-v5.5-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux

Pull FIELD_SIZEOF conversion from Kees Cook:
 "A mostly mechanical treewide conversion from FIELD_SIZEOF() to
  sizeof_field(). This avoids the redundancy of having 2 macros
  (actually 3) doing the same thing, and consolidates on sizeof_field().
  While "field" is not an accurate name, it is the common name used in
  the kernel, and doesn't result in any unintended innuendo.

  As there are still users of FIELD_SIZEOF() in -next, I will clean up
  those during this coming development cycle and send the final old
  macro removal patch at that time"

* tag 'sizeof_field-v5.5-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
  treewide: Use sizeof_field() macro
  MIPS: OCTEON: Replace SIZEOF_FIELD() macro

116 files changed, 299 insertions, 306 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
index ada573b7d703..edb296c52f61 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ Similarly, if you need to calculate the size of some structure member, use
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
-	#define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
+	#define sizeof_field(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
 
 There are also min() and max() macros that do strict type checking if you
 need them.  Feel free to peruse that header file to see what else is already
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/coding-style.rst
index 8995d2d19f20..8725f2b9e960 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ struttura, usate
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
-	#define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
+	#define sizeof_field(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
 
 Ci sono anche le macro min() e max() che, se vi serve, effettuano un controllo
 rigido sui tipi.  Sentitevi liberi di leggere attentamente questo file
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/coding-style.rst
index 4f6237392e65..eae10bc7f86f 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ inline gcc 也可以自动使其内联。而且其他用户可能会要求移除
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
-	#define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
+	#define sizeof_field(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
 
 还有可以做严格的类型检查的 min() 和 max() 宏，如果你需要可以使用它们。你可以
 自己看看那个头文件里还定义了什么你可以拿来用的东西，如果有定义的话，你就不应
diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
index dc05a63516f5..27ea64b1fa33 100644
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ do {						\
 
 #define EXTRA_INFO(f) { \
 		BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(offsetof(struct unwind_frame_info, f) \
-				% FIELD_SIZEOF(struct unwind_frame_info, f)) \
+				% sizeof_field(struct unwind_frame_info, f)) \
 				+ offsetof(struct unwind_frame_info, f) \
-				/ FIELD_SIZEOF(struct unwind_frame_info, f), \
-				FIELD_SIZEOF(struct unwind_frame_info, f) \
+				/ sizeof_field(struct unwind_frame_info, f), \
+				sizeof_field(struct unwind_frame_info, f) \
 	}
 #define PTREGS_INFO(f) EXTRA_INFO(regs.f)
 
diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-bootmem.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-bootmem.c
index ba8f82a29a81..e794b2d53adf 100644
--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-bootmem.c
+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-bootmem.c
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@ static struct cvmx_bootmem_desc *cvmx_bootmem_desc;
 /* See header file for descriptions of functions */
 
 /**
- * This macro returns the size of a member of a structure.
- * Logically it is the same as "sizeof(s::field)" in C++, but
- * C lacks the "::" operator.
- */
-#define SIZEOF_FIELD(s, field) sizeof(((s *)NULL)->field)
-
-/**
  * This macro returns a member of the
  * cvmx_bootmem_named_block_desc_t structure. These members can't
  * be directly addressed as they might be in memory not directly
@@ -65,7 +58,7 @@ static struct cvmx_bootmem_desc *cvmx_bootmem_desc;
 #define CVMX_BOOTMEM_NAMED_GET_FIELD(addr, field)			\
 	__cvmx_bootmem_desc_get(addr,					\
 		offsetof(struct cvmx_bootmem_named_block_desc, field),	\
-		SIZEOF_FIELD(struct cvmx_bootmem_named_block_desc, field))
+		sizeof_field(struct cvmx_bootmem_named_block_desc, field))
 
 /**
  * This function is the implementation of the get macros defined
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit32.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit32.h
index 6e5a2a4faeab..4ec2a9f14f84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit32.h
+++ b/