summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/app/widgets/base
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-11-24refactor: switch to iterative tree building for procClementTsang
2021-11-20refactor: Remove some dead codeClementTsang
2021-11-20refactor: mostly add back tree mode for processClementTsang
Mouse control on collapse is not working yet, need to do some work internally first.
2021-10-02refactor: various bug fixes and code removalClementTsang
2021-09-26refactor: delete more stuffClementTsang
Mostly previously re-added files during the merge conflict resolution, and a lot of unused code. Still more to delete after I finish rewriting the process kill dialog.
2021-09-26refactor: cover almost all keybinds except killing processesClementTsang
2021-09-24refactor: add process search conditions and errorClementTsang
2021-09-22refactor: finish help menuClementTsang
2021-09-07refactor: Add back scroll position and expandedClementTsang
2021-09-07refactor: use a builder for block buildingClementTsang
2021-09-07refactor: add back widget titlesClementTsang
Also has a few clippy fixes and bug fixes: - Fix redundant rerendering on scroll on time graphs. - Fix being off by one cell during rendering for no-battery situation on the battery widget. - Fix having empty columns for rtl column width calculations (as otherwise it goes to the wrong column). - Fix rendering issue on small windows with text tables. We also now ensure that the CPU legend has enough room to draw!
2021-09-05refactor: move basic mode overClementTsang
Because writing your own layout system and management is just *so much fun*. Totally. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Moves the basic mode system over to the new drawing/widget system. In the process, it has forced me to completely redo how we do layouts... again. This is because basic mode has widgets that control their own height - this means the height of the columns and rows that wrap it are also affected by the widget's height. The previous system, using a constraint tree and splitting draw Rects via tui-rs' built-in constraint solver, did not support this concept very well. It was not simple to propagate up the widths/heights towards parents while also using tui-rs' built-in constraint solver. In the end, it was easier to just rewrite it using another algorithm. We now follow a process very similar to Flutter's layout system. Relevant links to the Flutter docs are found in the code or below: - https://flutter.dev/docs/development/ui/layout/constraints - https://flutter.dev/docs/resources/inside-flutter#sublinear-layouts The gist of it, however, is that we now instead a few new options for any element in the layout tree. A node can either: - Grow to fill remaining space - Take up as much room as its children - Be a specific length Technically right now, it's not perfect, in that leaf nodes can be as large as their children (which makes no sense), though in that case it just treats it as an expand.
2021-09-05refactor: add back grouping and commandClementTsang
2021-09-05refactor: add text inputClementTsang
2021-09-05refactor: Add sort capabilities to processesClementTsang
2021-08-30bug: fix bug causing click bounds to failClementTsang
There were three bugs: 1. The click bounds calculation was incorrect. I did the silly mistake of checking for <= bounds for the bottom and right sections of a Rect when checking if the mouse intersected - this is WRONG. For example, let's say you want to calculate if an x value of 5 falls between something that starts at 0 and is 5 long. It shouldn't, right? Because it draws from 0 to 4? But if you just did <= Rect.right(), you would get a hit - because it just does (start + width), so you get 5, and 5 <= 5! So, easy fix, change all far bounds checks to <. 2. The second bug is a mistake where I accidentally did not include bounds sets for my memory and net widgets. Instead, they set their bounds to the underlying graph representation, which is WRONG, since that bound gets updated on draw, and gets set to a slightly smaller rect due to borders! 3. A slightly sneakier one. This broke my bounds checks for the CPU widget - and it would have broken my process widget too. The problem lies in the concept of widgets that handle multiple "sub"-blocks internally, and how I was doing click detection internally - I would check if the bounds of the internal Components were hit. Say, the CPU, I would check if the internal graph was hit, then if the internal table was hit. But wait! I said in point 2 that a graph gets its borders updated on draw to something slightly smaller, due to borders! And there's the problem - it affected tables too. I was setting the bounds of components to that of the *internal* representation - without borders - but my click detection *needed* borders included! Solution? Add another trait function to check bordered bounds, and make the default implementation just check the existing bounds. For cases like internal Components that may need it, I add a separate implementation. I also switched over all border bounds checks for Widgets to that, since it's a bit more consistent.
2021-08-29refactor: change up event handling logisticsClementTsang
Slightly move around the ideas of EventResult, ReturnSignalResult, and how they all work. The gist of it is that we now have widgets returning EventResults (and renamed to WidgetEventResult), and the main app event handler returns ReturnSignalResult (now named EventResult). Also add a new signal to handle re-updating data inputs! This is needed for the process, and any sortable/configurable widget.
2021-08-29refactor: Add data updating to process widgetClementTsang
2021-08-29refactor: another pass on sorting and columnsClementTsang
2021-08-28refactor: add network drawing cache systemClementTsang
2021-08-28refactor: port over graph widgetsClementTsang
Things working as of now: - Actually drawing - Interpolation - Styling
2021-08-28refactor: separate out sorted and non-sorted text tablesClementTsang
2021-08-28refactor: start moving over the event systemClementTsang
2021-08-28refactor: start moving over drawing systemClementTsang
In particular, moving over table-style widgets
2021-08-24refactor: more glue code to build layoutClementTsang
Even more glue code to help glue together our layout options to our new layout system! Note that this PR will most likely likely break the two options: - default_widget_type - default_widget_count and as such, they'll probably be deleted in a later commit. As for why, it's since they're kinda a pain to support and don't work well. Users can still enable default widget selection through the layout system (which will also see a revamp in the future).
2021-08-23refactor + change: write new movement logicClementTsang
2021-08-23refactor: Create new main widgetsClementTsang
2021-08-23refactor: Create basic widget systemClementTsang